(All integrations are in respect of dx)
Its known that:
Now if we integrate both parts we have that:
and correct me if i am wrong but:
So
And comparing 1 and 2
What am i missing here?
Thank you a lot
(All integrations are in respect of dx)
Its known that:
Now if we integrate both parts we have that:
and correct me if i am wrong but:
So
And comparing 1 and 2
What am i missing here?
Thank you a lot
Thank you
Indeed this explains the result.
However i rely on the fact that is the "neutral" element in calculus (as unit is at multiplication / division).
So what about if we derive the initial relation???
I thing we lead to a similar inconvinient result.
of course in this last case (for negative n) can be defined properly so the last relation to be valid