2^4 = 4^2 (X^Y=Y^X) I have to prove that (2,4) and (4,2) are the only pairs of distinct positive whole numbers having that property. I would also like to change the function into parametric but am quite lost. I have found some information concerning this topic but as of now it seems like gibberish (Can anyone help explain??):

First take the log of both sides:

log(X^Y) = log(Y^X)

and simplify:

Y*log(X) = X*log(Y)

and then divide by X*Y:

log(X) log(Y)

------ = ------.

X Y

Now you should consider the function

log(x)

f(x) = ------.

x

Clearly, we have a solution to the last equation if and only if

f(X) = f(Y).

Well, this happens when X = Y, but does it happen elsewhere? If we graph

y = f(x)

we will find that f increases from y = -infinity at x = 0 to y = 1/e

at x = e (that's e = 2.71828... whether you used the common log or the

natural log or the log to any other base), and then f decreases from

y = 1/e at x = e to y = 0 at x = infinity.

Well, if X and Y are different values and

f(X) = f(Y),

then that means that there is a horizontal line which passes through

our function at two points (namely X and Y). Look at the function,

and you'll find that the smaller value is somewhere between 1 and e,

and the larger value is bigger than e. Also, the closer the smaller

value is to e, the closer the larger value is to e. The closer the

smaller value is to 1, the bigger the larger value is.

So what you find is that if X <= 1, then the only solution is Y = X.

Similarly, if X = e, then the only solution is Y = X. But if

1 < X < e,

then there are exactly two solutions for Y, one of which is Y = X, and

the other is some number bigger than e. Similarly, if

e < X,

then there are exactly two solutions for Y, one of which is Y = X, and

the other is some number between 1 and e.

But can you write out a formula for the smaller value in terms of the

bigger value, or vice-versa? Well, not using any closed-form

function. But you can use numerical methods to find approximate

solutions for any X value.

It occurs to me that there is something else about this equation that

you might be interested in. The solutions you gave (2, 4) and (4, 2)

are in integers. In fact, these solutions and X = Y are the only

solutions in positive integers. And the only integer solutions are X

= Y and (2, 4), (4, 2), (-2,-4), (-4, -2).

Proving that is as follows: First suppose that X and Y are positive.

By switching the order of X and Y, we may assume that Y >= X. Now

divide both sides of the equation by X^X.

X^(Y-X) = (Y/X)^X.

Since the left side is clearly an integer, the right side has to be an

integer. But if you raise a non-integer rational number to an integer

power, then you don't get an integer. So that means that

k = Y/X

must be an integer (bigger than 0). Now we re-write our equation as

X^(kX - X) = k^X.

We take the positive real X'th root of both sides of the equation and get

X^(k-1) = k.

Now if X >= 2, then:

(a) k = 1 always works (and means X = Y)

(b) k = 2 implies X = X^(2-1) = 2 (and gives your solutions)

(c) k = 3 implies X^(k-1) > k

(d) by induction on k, k >= 3 implies

X^(k-1) = X*X^(k-2) > X(k-1) >= 2k-2 > k,

so there are only the solutions already mentioned when X >= 2.

But X = 1 implies Y = 1. And X = 0 implies Y = 0. And if X is

negative, but Y is positive, then Y^X is positive, so X^Y is positive,

which means that Y is even and

X^Y = (-X)^Y = Y^X, so (-X)^Y * Y^(-X) = 1,

but then (-X)^Y and Y^(-X) both have to be 1, so X is -1 and Y = 1.

Finally, if X and Y are both negative, then we raise both sides to the

-1 power and get

X^(-Y) = Y^(-X)

and then if X is odd and Y is even or vice-versa, then the signs don't

match, but if X and Y are both odd, then we multiply both sides of the

equation by -1 to get

(-X)^(-Y) = (-Y)^(-X).

If both X and Y are even, then we don't need to multiply, and we still

get the same equation. So (-X, -Y) is a solution in positive integers.

Wow! That was a huge message, and without LaTex I doubt many people will be willing to read it all.

Anway, you reached already the conclusion that it'd be wise to study the function ...and indeed, it is wise: check that this function has a maximum at and thus it gets twice all the values in the interval when

Now check that the only integers s.t. are 2,4.

Tonio