In my Ti-89T (OS 3.10)
it gave me the correct answer though.
f(x)= and g(x)= .
(fog)(x)=(gof)(x)
=
If I plot - =0,
and do a F5,2 (Zero), I get xc=-962025 and yc=-.02286
In fact, if I plot another graph, y2=0, and find the intersection, I get the correct answer (-1,0)
Why is there an inaccuracy in the Zero function?
Besides, my TI89Ti takes around 4 seconds to plot this graph. How can I speed up the graphing? I have disabled pretty-print, set the coordinates format to rectangular (in polar form, I noticed, the calc takes more time), disabled Discontinuity Detection (F3,Graph->F1,Tools,9:Format).
Any ideas?