Now I think I worked out correctly land A at 1000 and f fertiliser at 50. Can anyone corroborate this and help me with the next part? Thanks
I am very stuck on this part of a question. The first part was easy enough, and basically I found out the following information about a farmer: The farmer has £ 15,000 to spend on renting land A, and onfertiliser F. I worked out previously that the the rent for an acre of land is £ 10 and thatFertiliser costs £ 100 per ton. If the
farmer’s yield in bushels of wheat is
W(A, F) = 400AF^0.5
by using the Lagrangean method, fi…nd the amounts of land and fertiliser which will
maximise the farmer’s yield. Verify that you have a maximum. How would you
measure the marginal increase in yield of increasing the budget, and what value
would you obtain?
Now, I know that I take the partial derivativea and set them equal to zero, but I just don't know where to start. Can anyone help me?
You want to maximize with constraint (I am assuming that A is the number of acres of land and F is number oftons of fertilizer. That should have been said.)
The Lagrange multiplier method (I tend to think of the "Lagrangean" as being a physica function) says that at a max or min we will have which gives the two equations , .
Since a specific value of is not part of the solution, I find it simplest, often, to eliminate by dividing one equation by the other: . That is, A= 20F. Putting that into the constraint, 10A+ 100F= 200F+ 100F= 300F= 15000 and so F= 50 and then A= 20(50)= 1000, exactly as you say.
The "marginal increase" of increasing the budget, b, would be and, because , and .