http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/2584/imageskr.jpg
I know roughly what has to be done here, but for some reason its not working out like the other questions, any help would be greatly appreciated!
Printable View
http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/2584/imageskr.jpg
I know roughly what has to be done here, but for some reason its not working out like the other questions, any help would be greatly appreciated!
and you want to show that.
Okay, if n= 1,.
Now suppose that, for some k,. Now
. And you want to show that that is less than k+1.
Looks to me that you just need to show that!
Ah I see, yes, it was at that stage I got confused.
I thought to prove it you would have to rearrange the RHS to show that the summation + the next term < k+1
Why do you need to show that (k+1)/(k+2) is less than one?
Here is the "rearrangement" version you wanted:
and you are done.
HallsofIvy's point was somewhat more elegant.
Whoops, forgot to type a step. Here's the "rearrangment" proof:
Thanks for pointing that out, malaygoel.
for
I think I see why that fraction has to be less than one. That right hand side should be k+1, or whenever you add the next term to the LHS you only add one to the RHS? So that fraction we gained from the LHS has to be less than 1 for the RHS to still be greater?
Thanks guys for your help!
.