Concentrate on one side of the inequality at a time.
Solive this, then go on to the next inequality.
Solve this (hint: is a factor of the LHS). Then combine the two solutions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexmahone
is positive
Dividing throughout by ,
divided by is not (Shake)
July 1st 2009, 06:06 AM
alexmahone
-deleted-
July 1st 2009, 06:09 AM
alexmahone
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheAbstractionist
divided by is not (Shake)
I'm aware of the fact; nevertheless dividing by a positive term does not change the inequality. My solution is correct.
July 1st 2009, 06:11 AM
TheAbstractionist
I mean if you divide
by you should get
not
In any case, is not a solution.
July 1st 2009, 06:21 AM
mark1950
Hmm...alex, the answer given is 0<x<1 or 1<x<2. Why is it so?
July 1st 2009, 06:30 AM
alexmahone
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark1950
Hmm...alex, the answer given is 0<x<1 or 1<x<2. Why is it so?
That's because x=1 is NOT a solution.
July 1st 2009, 06:31 AM
pfarnall
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexmahone
I'm aware of the fact; nevertheless dividing by a positive term does not change the inequality. My solution is correct.
Think about this example and you'll see you're in error:
We can all agree that 2 is positive so by your working:
Clearly this is not true and you must divide all parts of the inequality by 2 not just the middle term.
July 1st 2009, 06:33 AM
alexmahone
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfarnall
Think about this example and you'll see you're in error:
We can all agree that 2 is positive so by your working:
Clearly this is not true and you must divide all parts of the inequality by 2 not just the middle term.