provided that x is real, prove that the function (2(3x-1))/(3(x^2-9) can take all real values. i believe this can be done by proving that there are no real roots to the quadratic equation obtained by introducing y=f(x). but why?
Let . Rewriting will give you a quadratic equation, with y in co-efficients. Show that for every real y, the quadratic equation has real roots
. By the quadratic formula, we have . Now for x to be real always, must be non-negative for all values of y. This quadratic expression is clearly positive since the discriminant is negative.
Hello, furor celtica!
This is probably not considered a proof.
Provided that is real, prove that: . can take all real values.
We note that: . .and there are vertical asymptotes at
Part of the graph looks like this:Code:: | : : | :* : | : : | : * : | : * : | : * : | : * - - - - - - - + - - | - - + - - - - - - - * 3: : :3 * : | : * : | : * : | : : | : *: | : : |
We see that takes all real values except 0.
And this provided by
sorry i made a little mistake in the problem, so im rewriting it and giving my proof, i'd like to know if it makes sense.
f(x)=y=2(3x+1) / 3(x^2 - 9)
=> 3x^2y - 6x - 27y -2
=> 36 - 12y(-27y -2) >= 0
=> 27y^2 + 2y + 3 >= 0
=> 27y^2 + 2y + 3 has no real roots
f(x) can take on all real values
is this proof conclusive?
1. Explain where each step comes from.
2. Clearly demonstrate that discriminant > 0.
3. Clearly explain why it follows from discriminant > 0 that y can take on on all real values except possibly for y = 0.
4. Explain why y = 0 is possible.
but is the conclusion correct for all that? and i am not too sure myself of the connection between the 'no real roots' and the conclusion that 'all values can be taken', its just that way in my textbook and i dont have a teacher. can someone suggest a link?