I updated the analysis, and there are new figures (of course in pixels)

In distances, point A to point B is 211.3 to 285.3 and the distance from point C to D is 366.1

Speed increase is 35.0% from point A to C and an apparent decrease in speed to 28.3% from point B to D

how can greater distance coverage equal reduced speed?

Unless the object is traveling back in time or something?

Can anybody recycle the numbers back to an much earlier point of origin (before point A) when the speed increase is 100% to the end, when the speed recycles itself back to 0% (after point D)

It's possible we're seeing an object of an interdimensional nhttp://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/editpost.php?do=editpost&p=322165ature slipping into dimensional space.