Or you can use the facts that and . Then the equation simplifies to , which you should be able to solve on a calculator.
I deleted my original post in this thread after seeing the other replies thinking I had made an awfull mistake, but looking at these replies I see that they are addressing the problem:
which seems natural enough because it can be solved in close form.
However that is not my reading of the question, which was to solve:
which is somewhat different! and I stand by my earlier now deleted post and suggest graphical and/or numerical solution for this.
There is a real solution is close to .
CB