is it posible to solve a non-liner system...and how!!!
for example
if any one has any thoughts on how you do this please let me know
~dan
Printable View
is it posible to solve a non-liner system...and how!!!
for example
if any one has any thoughts on how you do this please let me know
~dan
Of course,Quote:
Originally Posted by dan
Substitute,
Thus,
Cube both sides,
Expand and solve for the nasty nontic.
Note, the solutions not necessarily can be expressed in algebraic terms.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker
i hate to ask...but how do you slolve for y in that equation.
it seems i'v spent hours working on probelms of that type before....
would i use the "binomal therem"?
dan
using:Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker
and substituting into
will give two octics - a much easier problem than a single nonic. :D?
RonL
If you are lucky it will have a special form that will allow you to findQuote:
Originally Posted by dan
all or some or the roots. Otherwise numerically.
RonL
If you are happy with approximate solutions one could start garphically.Quote:
Originally Posted by dan
These two equations represent curves in the x-y plane. Sketch them
and your first approximation to the soution/s will be the point/s of
intersection.
Then they can be refined with an appropriate numerical procedure (say
linearising about the approximate roots, or something like that).
RonL
Not necessarily there is a general method.Quote:
Originally Posted by dan
Yes, you do expand with binomial theorem then work with polynomial equation.
(Do you not just love it when mathematicians say "I cannot solve the problem but I can show it cannot be solved!")
hahahaQuote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker
so if i had a polynomal. could i solve with newton??
i dont so how you get a nontic thoughjust because 3*3 is nine???
some how i got from
to
is that right???
dan
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlack
mabye i'll try that
Quote:
Originally Posted by dan
Thus,
yea...thanks i did something wrong...what else is new...Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker
so if
then
so could i use newton for here to approximate [tex] y [tex]
by my calc
look right??
What do you get if you substitute this back into the original equations?Quote:
Originally Posted by dan
Is there a x which with this as a value of y solves the equations?
RonL
(when I do this I get no consistent solution for x, but I could be doing the
arithmetic wrongly :( )