Simplify:

I know that's simple. I can express that as:

The problem is that, to me, that doesn't look any simpler.

I can't think of how else to express this. Is there another more appropriate answer?

Printable View

- August 21st 2008, 04:44 AMjerrySimplify this expression
Simplify:

I know that's simple. I can express that as:

The problem is that, to me, that doesn't look any simpler.

I can't think of how else to express this. Is there another more appropriate answer? - August 21st 2008, 05:04 AMMoo
- August 21st 2008, 06:35 AMSoroban
Hello, jerry!

Quote:

Simplify: .

I can express that as: .

The problem is that, to me, that doesn't look any simpler.

You have a*complex fraction*. . . one with more than two "levels".

. . We can and must simplify it further.

Multiply top and bottom by the LCD,

. .

- August 21st 2008, 03:56 PMjerry
OK. Thank you both for that!