Why isn't my rearranging correct? How would you correctly rearrange this to find t?
Printable View
Why isn't my rearranging correct? How would you correctly rearrange this to find t?
Hello there :D
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that.
We have the equationbut we don't know the value of
yet (since we're looking for it...) hence we cannot divide the equation by
without considering two cases :
- First case :
. We can safely divide the equation by
(since it does not equal 0) and it gives us
. That's one of the solutions.
- Second case :
. For
, the equation is true since
hence
is the other solution.
Is it clearer ?
or simply, from, you can factor out
so that it becomes
..
therefore, from there, eitheror
..
Oh dear.
See, the answer is 60.
Okay, what we had to do, is use the formula at the start, which is DV/Dt, and find the maximum.
They drew a graph, to find maximum = 60.
I put DV/Dt = 0, but only obtained the two minimum values, 90 and 0.
OH you're right! I had a derivative already, so I ignored the fact that I needed to find the derivative of THAT to get the maximum.
I still don't see how we got the minimums though. Unless the minimums happened to be the minimums/maximums of the original formula as well, I guess they were.
Thanks very much for your help :D
Just a query...I differentiated to find the maximum, and came out with t=0 or t=60. Is this right? t shouldn't be 0.
I differentiated to:
1/100(180t-3t^2)
Then, put that equal to 0, and rearranged:
0=1.8t-0.03t^2
0=t(1.8-0.03t)
So, due to the law "If A*B=0, either A or B=0", I decided that t=0 or (1.8-0.03t)=0. This gives t=0 or t=60.
Am I wrong?
No, that's it. The thing is that the points such thatcan be local maximums or local minimums.
To show thatis a local maximum, you can, for example, show that
increases on
and decreases on
. (
on
and
on
)
The same idea applies to show thatis a local minimum : simply show that the derivative is negative for
and positive for
.
Oh, I should've guessed that. You mean, differentiating finds the maximum and the minimum (which I obviously knew), so 0 is the minimum.
Heh, easy. :P
Thanks again. :D