I'm confused about your notation. Is this what you mean for the first one? ?
I think you will have to adopt a clearer notation here.Originally Posted by scfan000
I'm guessing here, do you intend that
Then do you intend that denote the common (log to base 10)
or natrural log of ?
I am also mystified by what you want "Log4Log(2)X" to represent.
Might I suggest that you use "log_n(x)" to denote the log to the base
n of x, be explicit in all instances about the base, and rewrite your questions
Originally Posted by Jameson
first turn it upside down (this is a personal preference, it can be done this way up):
then apply the change of base rule for logs to the left hand side to reduce
the all the logs to the same base as that on the right hand side.