Maple says that

Attachment 29407

why is each of the|Xi-Xj| multiplied by two?

Is it that |Xi - Xj| =|Xj - Xi|?

I had not realized that double summation multiplies sums every combination of Xi and Xj

Printable View

- Oct 8th 2013, 09:26 AMkingsolomonsgravesummation question
Maple says that

Attachment 29407

why is each of the|Xi-Xj| multiplied by two?

Is it that |Xi - Xj| =|Xj - Xi|?

I had not realized that double summation multiplies sums every combination of Xi and Xj - Oct 8th 2013, 10:05 AMemakarovRe: summation question
Yes. There are nine ordered pairs $\displaystyle (i, j)$, and three of them (with equal elements) give rise to $\displaystyle |X_i - X_i| = 0$. The other six are split into three pairs because $\displaystyle |X_i - X_j| =|X_j - X_i|$.

If you want just $\displaystyle |X_1-X_2|+|X_1-X_3|+|X_2-X_3|$, you can denote it by $\displaystyle \sum_{1\le i<j\le 3}|X_i-X_j|$. - Oct 8th 2013, 08:44 PMibduttRe: summation question
- Oct 9th 2013, 04:27 AMSlipEternalRe: summation question
On line 4, you keep i=1 for all three terms. On line 5, you keep i=2 for all three terms. Then on line 6, you keep i=3 for all three terms.

It should read (beginning on line 4):

$\displaystyle \begin{align*}= & \hspace{1em}\hspace{3pt} |x_1-x_1| + |x_2-x_1| + |x_3-x_1| \\ & + |x_1-x_2| + |x_2-x_2| + |x_3-x_2| \\ & + |x_1-x_3| + |x_2-x_3| + |x_3-x_3| \\ = & \hspace{1em}\hspace{3pt} 0 + |x_2-x_1| + |x_3-x_1| \\ & + |x_1-x_2| + 0 + |x_3-x_2| \\ & + |x_1-x_3| + |x_2-x_3| + 0 \\ = & \, \left(|x_1-x_2| + |x_2-x_1|\right) + \left(|x_1-x_3| + |x_3-x_1|\right) + \left(|x_2-x_3| + |x_3-x_2|\right) \\ = & \, 2\left(|x_1-x_2| + |x_1-x_3| + |x_2-x_3|\right)\end{align*}$ - Oct 9th 2013, 08:39 PMibduttRe: summation question
Sorry i made some typing mistake, it shd be as under

Attachment 29432 - Oct 10th 2013, 06:44 AMSlipEternalRe: summation question
Yes, that is correct.