Confusing range of a Relation.
Okay. So our assignment is to get the domain, range, intercepts, etc. of the relation (also a function but not expressed as one)
. I didn't have a problem at all till I realize that I got ![(-\infty,-5]\cup[-1/5,0)\cup(0,+\infty)](http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?(-\infty,-5]\cup[-1/5,0)\cup(0,+\infty))
(I EXCLUDED ZERO because when I solved for x, y is in the DENOMINATOR) as the range and have an x-intercept )
which is a contradiction with the range.
Now, it leaves me with a dilemma because I can't include zero in the range because x will be undefined (at least if you use quadratic formula by manipulating the given equation which I think alters its nature I presume), and I can't just simply remove the x-intercept because of the same reason.
Here's my question, do I include zero in the range OR remove the x-intercept OR just leave my answer as it is.
And please explain why.
Re: Confusing range of a Relation.
It seems to me that
and
, your x-intercept is correct. Include y=0 in the range as it gives a corresponding x-value.
What about when
?
Re: Confusing range of a Relation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pickslides
It seems to me that

Huh? Do you mean that the range is all real numbers? I think you must recheck it (or maybe I'm the one who is wrong).
Re: Confusing range of a Relation.