Let a,b, c be non-negative real nos. such that a+b+c=1. Prove that a2+b2+c2+sqrt(12abc)<=1.
Please help me with this one. I don't really have an idea how to prove inequalities. TY.
Printable View
Let a,b, c be non-negative real nos. such that a+b+c=1. Prove that a2+b2+c2+sqrt(12abc)<=1.
Please help me with this one. I don't really have an idea how to prove inequalities. TY.
Given, squaring both sides yields
.
Here, if we can show thator
, we are done.
Squaring both sides of this inequality,(by replacing a+b+c with 1). This is what we want to prove.
By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality,. Simplifying, we obtain
, which is exactly what we wanted to prove. Hence we're done.
Thank you. But is there another way of proving this without using that Cauchy-Schwarz inequality because I think we didn't tackled it in our class discussion yet.
Or can you give me the brief proof of that inequality without using calculus because I don't have a single knowledge in calculus. Please. TY very MUCH.
To prove inequality
consider quadratic function
Since it is sum of squares than it is never negative, therefore its discriminant is never positive:.
Now expand function (recall that):
or
Find discriminant:
Also,
Therefore
Or
As you see no calculus needed.
Why does the discriminant is non-positive? What I knew is that the root of a quadratic function will become imaginary if the discriminant is negative.
Do you know any OTHER WAY or SOLUTION to approach this problem? I think your solutions combined is very long and complicated. But thank you very very much for your replies.
Sorry for my ignorance in higher math. I'm usually good at math but not on this one. It's my first time to solve a problem like this.
That's the way inequality problems are; usually you have to use some inequality such as Cauchy-Schwarz, AM-GM, Jensen's, rearrangement inequality, or Muirhead's. Usually you don't see such inequality problems until you take exams such as the USAMO or IMO, which are pretty difficult.
Also, do you see how I got fromto
? Sorry I skipped a few steps...but if you expand the RHS you should obtain the same thing...
Yea. I think I did traced how you came into that equation.
Okay, great. Yeah, theis essentially the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.
In general, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality says that, for non-negative numbersand
, that
Equality occurs if and only ifis a constant multiple of
, that is,
for all i. It can be generalized even further to complex numbers and vectors.