Hello, FelixHelix!
Your work is absolutely correct.
Maple is wrong . . . I have no idea why.
hi - I've got an intergral to solve but when seperating this fraction get a different answer to my Maple solution. Take a look and show me where i'm going wrong because i'm stumped!
i)
ii)
but my program tells me its
I can't see why the negative sign is introduced. Any ideas??
Cheers, F
Edit: Beaten to it.
Let
Let
As far as I can tell there isn't an error with your work. Wolfram Alpha agrees in this respect, but not this one, so I wonder whether there's some sort of problem with their Gaussian Elimination or something.