Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Hello forum vaironxxrd here.
I have this problem that is, a radical with two variables in it.
Problem: 
Solution:
= 
= 
Is that solution right? or what am I doing wrong?
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vaironxxrd
Problem:

Solution:

=

=
Is that solution right? or what am I doing wrong?
Just about all of that is incorrect.

Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vaironxxrd
Hello forum vaironxxrd here.
I have this problem that is, a radical with two variables in it.
Problem:
Solution:

=

=
Is that solution right? or what am I doing wrong?

Indeed
so you have 
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Plato
Just about all of that is incorrect.

Out of interest, why is the 5 not +-5? I see that x is the absolute value, is this because it was x^2 under the radical therefore 'originally' a + or - number, whereas 25 was, well, just 25?
Thanks.
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hachataltoolimhakova
Out of interest, why is the 5 not +-5? I see that x is the absolute value, is this because it was x^2 under the radical therefore 'originally' a + or - number, whereas 25 was, well, just 25?
Because ![\left( {\forall x} \right)\left( {\forall y \geqslant 0} \right)\left[ {\sqrt {25x^2 y} \geqslant 0} \right]](http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?\left( {\forall x} \right)\left( {\forall y \geqslant 0} \right)\left[ {\sqrt {25x^2 y} \geqslant 0} \right])
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Thanks for the response. I do not know what that means since I am not familiar with the notation. Am I correct in believing
yields the same result as using 5? Again, thanks for the response. An explanation of that notation would be good. I found 'for all', that was all I could interpret.
EDIT: Ah, is it because it is the principle square root and since y is positive, 5 has to be positive? Otherwise the overall term would be negative, and it wouldn't be the prinicpal square root?
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hachataltoolimhakova
Thanks for the response. I do not know what that means since I am not familiar with the notation. Am I correct in believing
^2)
yields the same result as using 5? Again, thanks for the response. An explanation of that notation would be good. I found 'for all', that was all I could interpret.
EDIT: Ah, is it because it is the principle square root and since y is positive, 5 has to be positive? Otherwise the overall term would be negative, and it wouldn't be the prinicpal square root?
Yes, that is true. While both
and
. The square root function is defined by "
is the non-negative number whose square is a" in order that it be single valued.
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vaironxxrd
Problem:

Solution:

NO it must be
You see that
could be negative.
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Plato
Just about all of that is incorrect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by
e^(i*pi)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Plato
NO it must be
You see that

could be negative.
It make allot of sense , it's a variable therefore I don know the value.
So, I should always place variables in ||?
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vaironxxrd
So, I should always place variables in ||?
Well that depends.
.
Because odd powers can be negative but even powers are not negative.
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Plato
Just about all of that is incorrect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by
e^(i*pi)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Plato
Well that depends.

.
Because odd powers can be negative but even powers are not negative.
Thanks a lot for the explanation, Plato.
Makes even more sense now!
I will watch a couple of videos doing radicals with ratios, and I might open a new thread. Thanks again
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HallsofIvy
The square root
function is defined by "

is the
non-negative number whose square is a" in order that it be single valued.
I have a dumb question. If I have the function
I can have two solutions which yield non-negative numbers:
for x>=0 and
for x<=0. Are these valid solutions providing I state the ranges, or are they not valid because they do not satisfy all values of x? I assume the absolute value signs ensure that all values of x are valid. I was just wondering because by stating ranges for x, I can include -5 as a solution.
Thanks in advance.
Re: Simplifying radical expressions with variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hachataltoolimhakova
I have a dumb question. If I have the function
 = \sqrt{25x^{2}y})
I can have two solutions which yield non-negative numbers:

for x>=0 and

for x<=0. Are these valid solutions providing I state the ranges, or are they not valid because they do not satisfy all values of x? I assume the absolute value signs ensure that all values of x are valid. I was just wondering because by stating ranges for x, I can include -5 as a solution.
You do not need cases. Just write:
.
The domain is 