I have the line y=ax + b

I am told that y=-ax + b is an inverse of the first line. Why is this so? I know that inverses are symmetrical about the line y=x. I graphed y=ax+3 and y=-ax+3, and they do not seem symmetrical about the line y=x to me.

Printable View

- August 8th 2011, 12:47 PMbenny92000Inverse functions and symmetry
I have the line y=ax + b

I am told that y=-ax + b is an inverse of the first line. Why is this so? I know that inverses are symmetrical about the line y=x. I graphed y=ax+3 and y=-ax+3, and they do not seem symmetrical about the line y=x to me. - August 8th 2011, 12:58 PMSironRe: Inverse functions and symmetry
Because the statement is not true, you can determine the inverse of by changing and and solve back to y=.., like this:

Calculating the inverse:

For example:

The inverse function has to be

Now look at the graphs of this functions, they're symmetrical towards the first bissectrice (y=x). - August 8th 2011, 01:02 PMBERMES39Re: Inverse functions and symmetry
To find the inverse function of y= ax+b, replace x for y and y for x, then solve for y:

x=ay+b inverse: y= (x-b)/a

for instance: y = 3x +2 The inverse: y = (x-2)/3. Try the graph, they are symmetrical to the line y=x. - August 8th 2011, 01:06 PMBERMES39Re: Inverse functions and symmetry
Hey Siron we must have similar minds!

- August 8th 2011, 01:17 PMSironRe: Inverse functions and symmetry
- August 9th 2011, 07:37 AMbenny92000Re: Inverse functions and symmetry
So the two equations I are NOT inverses?

- August 9th 2011, 07:42 AMSironRe: Inverse functions and symmetry
is indeed not the inverse function of

Like you said, if you graph these lines then they're not symmetrical to the first bissectrice ( ).

Have you graphed the example I and BERMES39 have given you?