I can't find a common difference. Is that the way to start?
You can assume without loss of generality that .
Edit: Actually, easier to assume (perhaps this is what they meant anyway), and then equate (the second term minus the first term) with (the third term minus the second term) which will naturally lead to the desired result.
Hello, Stuck Man!
8. It is given that: .
. . are three consecutive terms of an arithmetic sequence.
Show that are also three consecutive terms on an arithmetic sequence.
The difference of consecutive terms is the common difference,
Divide [1] by [2]: .
and we have: .
. . . . . c-b)(c+b)" alt="(b-a)(b+a) \:=\c-b)(c+b)" />
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . is the mean of and .
Therefore, form an arithmetic sequence.
Also, if
are consecutive terms in an arithmetic series,
then it's only necessary to prove
Starting from the original sequence...
Multiply both sides by (a+c)
Multiply both sides by (b+c)
Multiply both sides by (a+b)
Note you can swap and and still get the same result. This is what Undefined meant by "without loss of generality" ... the result Undefined gave can be adapted in trivial ways to any possible context, although it would be too long (and boring) to enumerate them all, so we just say WLOG.