Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Inverse & Composition Function Problem

  1. #1
    Member
    Joined
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    1

    Inverse & Composition Function Problem

    #1.)

    Given $\displaystyle f(x) = x+3$ and $\displaystyle h(x) = 4x-4 <=> 4(x-1)$; find a function $\displaystyle g(x)$ such that $\displaystyle g(f(x)) = h(x) <=> g(x+3) = 4(x-1)$.

    I'm having trouble determining what $\displaystyle g(x)$ should be - I don't know the method to determine this. If I was just asked to find any two functions whos composition resulted in $\displaystyle h(x$) I would have just decomposed $\displaystyle h(x)$ as $\displaystyle a(x) = 4x$ and $\displaystyle b(x) = x-1 <=> a(b(x)) = 4(x-1)$ - but I'm obviously forced to use the inside function $\displaystyle f(x) = x+3$.

    #2.)

    Given $\displaystyle f(x) = 3x + ln(x)$ find $\displaystyle f^-1(x)$. In other words, solve for $\displaystyle y$ in $\displaystyle x = 3y + ln(y)$.

    I posted #2 in a previous thread, but I didn't really get the response I was looking for - I would appreciate the explanation for the answer if possible.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Master Of Puppets
    pickslides's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    From
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,237
    Thanks
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by TaylorM0192 View Post
    #1.)

    Given $\displaystyle f(x) = x+3$ and $\displaystyle h(x) = 4x-4 <=> 4(x-1)$; find a function $\displaystyle g(x)$ such that $\displaystyle g(f(x)) = h(x) <=> g(x+3) = 4(x-1)$.

    I'm having trouble determining what $\displaystyle g(x)$ should be - I don't know the method to determine this. If I was just asked to find any two functions whos composition resulted in $\displaystyle h(x$) I would have just decomposed $\displaystyle h(x)$ as $\displaystyle a(x) = 4x$ and $\displaystyle b(x) = x-1 <=> a(b(x)) = 4(x-1)$ - but I'm obviously forced to use the inside function $\displaystyle f(x) = x+3$.
    try $\displaystyle g(x)=4x-8$
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Member
    Joined
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    1
    Your g(x) does not result in 4x-4 when composed with f(x) = x+3 as the inner function. However, thank you for pointing me in the right direction, since it appears g(x) = 4x-16 works.

    But I still would like to know the steps to approach problems like these, since the method of trial and error in finding a correct function seems impractical later on.

    And the 2nd question is still giving me problems...I simply don't know what to do with the logarithm when the variable I am solving for is in two separate terms...
    Last edited by TaylorM0192; Feb 2nd 2010 at 07:41 PM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Master Of Puppets
    pickslides's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    From
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,237
    Thanks
    33
    $\displaystyle g(x+3)= 4x-4$

    Lets say $\displaystyle g(x)=ax+b$

    $\displaystyle a(x+3)+b= 4x-4$

    Expand

    $\displaystyle ax+3a+b= 4x-4$

    Equate coefficents

    $\displaystyle ax= 4x \implies a=4$

    and

    $\displaystyle 3a+b= -4$ with $\displaystyle a=4$ gives $\displaystyle 3\times 4+b= -4\implies b = -16$

    $\displaystyle g(x)= 4x-16 $
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    Member
    Joined
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    1
    Thanks bud, appreciate the explanation.

    Any suggestions on the 2nd problem? I started by isolating the natural logarithm, them setting each term as an exponent with base 'e' (thus isolating 1 'y' by itself). But then the other 'y' becomes an exponent which can only be isolated by going back to the original equation and taking the natural logarithm of both sides...Whatever I try, I end up with ugly terms -
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  6. #6
    Member
    Joined
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    1
    I've gotten to this point in trying to find the inverse for $\displaystyle f(x)=ln(x)+3x$:


    $\displaystyle x=ln(y)+3y$
    $\displaystyle ln(y)=x-3y$
    $\displaystyle y=e^{x-3y}$



    Is it even possible to isolate 'y' to a single term to create an inverse function?

    The ultimate question is, what is $\displaystyle f^{-1}(3) $ of $\displaystyle f(x)=ln(x)+3x$.

    Thanks ...
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  7. #7
    Master Of Puppets
    pickslides's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2008
    From
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,237
    Thanks
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by TaylorM0192 View Post

    The ultimate question is, what is $\displaystyle f^{-1}(3) $ of $\displaystyle f(x)=ln(x)+3x$.

    Thanks ...
    Thats better, giving a bit more information like that makes life easier.

    consider $\displaystyle f(x)=\ln(x)+3x$

    by inspection $\displaystyle f(1)=\ln(1)+3\times 1 = 0+3=3$

    so we can say $\displaystyle f^{-1}(3)= 1$
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Inverse and composition functions
    Posted in the Discrete Math Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sep 22nd 2010, 03:54 AM
  2. Composition of an Inverse Hyperbolic Function
    Posted in the Pre-Calculus Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Aug 22nd 2010, 03:26 AM
  3. Function composition problem
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: May 13th 2010, 07:56 AM
  4. function composition problem
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Mar 23rd 2010, 11:34 PM
  5. function composition and inverse function
    Posted in the Discrete Math Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Nov 10th 2009, 12:18 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum