Results 1 to 7 of 7

Math Help - Other equations

  1. #1
    Banned
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    21

    Other equations

    Hi,

    I'm from over the PHF site, i was wondering if you masters of maths could help me or just say no that's it thats the equation to use?

    Obviously by now i realise the asker should post their attempt, so i will, but what i'm asking is for an alternative solution.

    Example:

    A stone is dropped from a cliff in the last 2 secs it travels a decimal fraction of 0.5665 of the total height, find the total time?


    This is my attempt of which i know will be correct, sorry but i haven't mastered laTEX as of yet!

    2/(1-sq-rt(1-0.5665)) = 5.855 secs

    I know how to click the thanks button too!
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,240

    Talking

    What was the source of your equation? What was your reasoning?

    The basic equation for this sort of exercise is:

    s(t)\, =\, -4.9t^2\, +\, v_0 t\, +\, h_0

    ...where s is the height (in meters) at time t seconds, v_0 is the initial velocity, and h_0 is the initial height. You are given s(T) and s(T+2) = 0.

    I'm not sure what is meant by "a decimal fraction of 0.5665 of the total time"...? Is this the exact text of the exercise?

    Note: Since the object is "dropped", then v_0 = 0, so the equation reduces to:

    s(t)\, =\, -4.9t^2\, +\, h_0
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Banned
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    21
    Sorry, i have edited my post, typing error, please re-read.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,240

    Talking

    What is the source of your equation? What was your reasoning?

    I've given you that s(T + 2) = 0, so s(T) - s(T + 2) = s(T), which is also the height covered in the last two seconds. How far have you gotten in using this fact?

    Please be complete. Thank you!
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    Banned
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    21
    The source of my equation was from a poster in PHF, i tried it out to find it correct, my reasoning is that i know it's right but need to know if it can be simplified. I've gotten far enough by the fact that it is correct.

    Sorry, am i making myself look a fool here?

    You have given me an alternative, thank you! this is what i was searching for!

    What do you wish me to be complete about? have i not given enough info?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  6. #6
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,393
    Thanks
    1327
    As Stapel said, the "basic" equation here is s(t)\, =\, -4.9t^2\, +\, v_0 t\, +\, h_0, the height, in meters, after t seconds, of an object falling from height h_0 meters, with initial upward speed v_0 meters per second, and acceleration (due to gravity) of -9.8 meter per second per second.

    You problem, if I read this correctly, is to find the time a rock drops from some initial height, if the last two seconds it goes 0.5665 if the total height.

    Okay, since it "dropped" it was not thown upward or downward. Its initial speed is 0. Writing the total height as "h", in meters, its height after t seconds is h(t)= -4.9t^2+ h. Let T be the total time of fall- the number you are looking for. Then h(T)= -4.9T^2+ h= 0, since it is now at the bottom. Also, if it has to cover the last 0.5665 of the total height in the last two seconds, it must have gone (1- 0.5665)h by T-2: h(T-2)= -4.9(T-2)^2+ h= (1-0.5665)h so that, subtracting h from both sides, -4.9(T-2)^2= (1- 0.5665)h- h= -0.5665h.

    The equation -4.9T^2+ h= 0 is the same as h= -4.9T^2 and the equation -4.9(T-2)^2= -0.5665h is the same as h= (4.9/0.5665)(T-2)^2. Since those are both equal to h, you can set them equal to each other and solve for T. Once you have T, use either one to find h.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  7. #7
    Banned
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    21
    Hallsofivy,

    Well first of all thank you for answering me without taking a bad attitude to my question, if i was a BRILLIANT mathematician i wouldn't be asking! I once again thank you and for not trying to make me look an idiot. Your answers are both obviously good, but you explained yourself better of which makes you a better person.


    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: April 7th 2010, 02:22 PM
  2. Equi Potential Equations or Euler Type Equations
    Posted in the Differential Equations Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 2nd 2010, 02:58 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 27th 2009, 07:05 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 1st 2007, 06:35 AM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 29th 2007, 02:37 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum