Do you mean or ?
Please take a moment to check out http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-he...-tutorial.html. It is a very easy way to clarify your questions with precision to receive fast and efficient help.
5/2(a+2) <-6 and 3/4(a-2)<1
I am stuck.. so far I did 5/2 x (a+2)/1 ... I believe that is correct so far but it seems wrong.
Wouldn't it be... 5(a+2)=2 but I am unsure how this plugs back into 5/2(a+2) <-6
Also confused on this one..... -1 < -2x + 4 less than or equal to 5, and this does split into 2 equations?
is it right to look like -5<-2x?
Do you mean or ?
Please take a moment to check out http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-he...-tutorial.html. It is a very easy way to clarify your questions with precision to receive fast and efficient help.
can indeed be simplified by multiplying both sides by , but where did the go, and how did your turn into ?
I'd advise reading up on Solving Inequalities: An Overview, for a good brush up on some basic inequality solving techniques.
I'll start you off on the second one here.
I don't know what you mean by split into 2 equations, it doesn't need to be! You are correct to here!
We can divide both sides by , getting
Keep in mind that if you multiply or divide both sides by a negative number, the inequality changes sign, > to < and vice versa.
Can you apply these techniques to your first question now?
Also the tutorial I did not understand....
That is why I am confused on the <-6 and 3/4 (a-2) <1
I have no clue how to solve it I thought cross multiply by add a 1 under (a+2) making it a fraction but it seems wrong.
Problem #2 was -1 <-2x+4 less than or equal to 5
I got....
-1<-2+4 less/equal 5 -2x+4 less/equal 5
= 5/2 >x = x>-1/2
[-1/2,5/2)
Again, please read the LaTeX tutorial, I mean this in the best possible way that it is taxing to try to read through that mess of text just to help. LaTeX is not hard to learn. For example;
[tex]\frac{5}{2} (a+2)> -6[/tex] gives
Similarly [tex]-1 < -2x + 4 \leq 5[/tex] gives . Much easier for anyone to read your post and understand with accuracy the question you are asking rather than trying to decipher regular text. The attached latex pdf at http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-he...-tutorial.html has all of the symbols you will use, and it is just a matter of typing in the code for the symbol to put it in the equation.
\leq = (less equal)
\geq = (greater equal)
You can also click on any of the equations in picture form to see the code for it.
For question 2, you are right in that case.
For question 1, let's work through the simplification of the first inequality. But you can't expect to understand that entire inequality tutorial in the 8 minutes you took after I posted it. Read close.
Keep in mind that So if we multiply the whole thing by 2, the 2 cancels out.
Multiply both sides by 2 to get rid of the denominator.
Divide both sides by 5 to get rid of the 5 on the left side
Can you take it from here?
No, you would subtract 2 from both sides. If you recall, working with an inequality is much like working with an equality ( = ), except for the special rules such as reversing the sign when multiplying or dividing by a negative number, etc.
And you absolutely can multiply by the reciprocal, which is equivalent to multiplying by 2 and then dividing by 5. I noticed you started by multiplying by 2 in your first attempt, which is why I showed it the long way. The same technique we just solved this inequality with can also be used to solve the next inequality in this question.
Showing all the steps serves a great purpose of answering a question for an assignment, but if you can't rationale the steps here, even using the second question that I did show completely, how well will you be able to apply those concepts on a brand new question with different variations of numbers and variables such as in a test or in a later course?