Thread: simplifying long algebraic expressions

Hi,

I have an expression that I need to simplify:



I know how to simplify this algebraically using the FOIL method. I did it and I have the answer, but I'm really hoping there might be a different way to do it. Is there an easier way to simplify long algebraic expressions like this, especially given that i is a factor in each part?

Originally Posted by absvalue

Hi,

I have an expression that I need to simplify:



I know how to simplify this algebraically using the FOIL method. I did it and I have the answer, but I'm really hoping there might be a different way to do it. Is there an easier way to simplify long algebraic expressions like this, especially given that i is a factor in each part?

Is this the imaginary unit? Or just a regular variable?

Keep in mind is NOT a factor in each term.

We can't start pulling out 's.

I can't believe that I've been staring at the problem for 2 hours and missed that. Thanks for your help! I'll be sure to remember that.

Wait... quick question.



Wouldn't this evaluate to be:



And wouldn't that have a different value than the original expression? Please correct me if I'm missing something. Thanks.

Kasper has changed his/her post.

If the you are dealing with IS the imaginary unit, expand and you will end up with a and a term, which you can use to simplify into whole numbers.

Originally Posted by Kasper

Is this the imaginary unit? Or just a regular variable?

Keep in mind is NOT a factor in each term.

We can't start pulling out 's.

Sorry, I didn't see that you had updated your post. i is just a regular variable.

Originally Posted by absvalue

Sorry, I didn't see that you had updated your post. i is just a regular variable.

I'm not sure then, are you sure the question was to simplify or to expand? This expression is in its simplest form.

Originally Posted by Kasper

This expression is in its simplest form.

Originally Posted by Kasper

I'm not sure then, are you sure the question was to simplify or to expand? This expression is in its simplest form.

Yes, just double checked. The question was to simplify.

Originally Posted by absvalue

Wait... quick question.



Wouldn't this evaluate to be:

No, it wouldn't. Since you have only one i, it can be multiplied into only one term you could write it as
(i-ni)(1- m)(1- y)(1- x) or
(1- n)(i- mi)(1- y)(1- x) or
(1- n)(1- m)(i- yi)(1- x) or
(1- n)(1- m)(1- y)(i- xi).

And wouldn't that have a different value than the original expression? Please correct me if I'm missing something. Thanks.