Prove:

Printable View

- Aug 30th 2008, 01:05 PMkid funky friedSets and Probability
Prove:

- Aug 30th 2008, 01:24 PMPlato
The expression has no meaning.

It like adding a matrix to a number: meaningless!

So what are you working out?

What is the problem? - Aug 30th 2008, 02:02 PMChris L T521
- Aug 30th 2008, 02:03 PMPlato
As I have pointed out to you, is totally meaning less.

First is a number while is a set in a probability space.

We do not intersect numbers with sets: it is meaningless.

I think that I have done this for you, did I not?

You cannot pove what you have written! - Aug 30th 2008, 02:36 PMkid funky friedrevsion
Hopefully, my revision has meaning.

I just want to make sure this is legit.

Kid - Aug 31st 2008, 02:00 AMMoo
- Aug 31st 2008, 08:06 AMkid funky friedThx
Thanks Moo, I think I understand now.

I will revise-again.(Headbang)

Kid - Aug 31st 2008, 09:31 AMkid funky friedHave I seen the light?

Now I understand Plato's disdain! (Nod)

(I think) - Aug 31st 2008, 09:55 AMkid funky fried