Results 1 to 5 of 5

Math Help - Statistics! One more that needs to be checked!

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    39

    Exclamation Statistics! One more that needs to be checked!

    Hi all:

    thanks for all your help - especially Mr. Fantastic! You have all been great help! I have one more question - I have done my part and just want to make sure that what I did was correct!

    As always am putting my response in BOLD!! Lets hope my response is right!

    When obtaining a confidence interval for a population mean in the case of a finite population of size N and a sample size n which is greater than 0.05N, the margin of error is multiplied by the following finite population correction factor:


    <br />
{\sqrt{N-n}}/{\sqrt{N-1}}<br />

    a. Find the 95% confidence interval for the mean of 200 weights if a sample of 33 of those weights yields a mean of 147.7 pounds and a standard deviation of 26.7 pounds.
    We have {\sqrt{N-n}}/{\sqrt{N-1}} = {\sqrt{200-33}}/{\sqrt{200-1}}
    =0.916076405
    Now, going back to the data and using the table we have the confidence score as 1.96.
    147.7 - 1.96(26.7)/sqrt(13) < mu < 147.7 + 1.96(26.7)/sqrt(13)
    simplifying
    => 133.19 < mu < 162.21
    Now I assume that we multiply each of these by .9160... ?? Am i right?
    122.0122 < mu < 148.596


    b. Assume the sample of 33 weights is selected from a population of 2000 weights. Would you use the same technique as in part a? Why or why not? (Base your decision and explanation on the criteria for using this correction factor that is given above.)

    No we cannot use the same method as 2000 x 0.05 = 100 . 100 is the minimum number of samples we need before we can proceed along the same lines. The result will be skewed if we proceed in a similar fashion as above.


    Thanks in advance
    Darren!
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Flow Master
    mr fantastic's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    Zeitgeist
    Posts
    16,948
    Thanks
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by darren_a1 View Post
    Hi all:

    thanks for all your help - especially Mr. Fantastic! You have all been great help! I have one more question - I have done my part and just want to make sure that what I did was correct!

    As always am putting my response in BOLD!! Lets hope my response is right!

    When obtaining a confidence interval for a population mean in the case of a finite population of size N and a sample size n which is greater than 0.05N, the margin of error is multiplied by the following finite population correction factor:


    <br />
{\sqrt{N-n}}/{\sqrt{N-1}}<br />

    a. Find the 95% confidence interval for the mean of 200 weights if a sample of 33 of those weights yields a mean of 147.7 pounds and a standard deviation of 26.7 pounds.
    We have {\sqrt{N-n}}/{\sqrt{N-1}} = {\sqrt{200-33}}/{\sqrt{200-1}}
    =0.916076405
    Now, going back to the data and using the table we have the confidence score as 1.96.
    147.7 - 1.96(26.7)/sqrt(13) < mu < 147.7 + 1.96(26.7)/sqrt(13)
    simplifying
    => 133.19 < mu < 162.21
    Now I assume that we multiply each of these by .9160... ?? Am i right?
    122.0122 < mu < 148.596


    b. Assume the sample of 33 weights is selected from a population of 2000 weights. Would you use the same technique as in part a? Why or why not? (Base your decision and explanation on the criteria for using this correction factor that is given above.)

    No we cannot use the same method as 2000 x 0.05 = 100 . 100 is the minimum number of samples we need before we can proceed along the same lines. The result will be skewed if we proceed in a similar fashion as above.


    Thanks in advance
    Darren!
    b. looks OK. In a., the population sd is unknown - you're using the sample sd as an estimate - and n is small. So I think you'd want to use the t-statistic, NOT the z-statistic .....
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    39

    Exclamation Thanks!

    Mr F:

    thanks for the quick reply.

    My question would be do I still multiply by .9160.. with the answers that I get? Is that the correct thing to do?

    Cheers

    Darren
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    39

    Final answer check

    Mr. F:

    I finally did the math on that

    here is what i get before i multiply with the factor of 0.916076405

    162.37 < mu < 133.03

    after multiplying by 0.916076405 we have

    148.74 < mu < 121.86


    Hope some one can help me out with this!

    Thanks

    Darren
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    Flow Master
    mr fantastic's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    Zeitgeist
    Posts
    16,948
    Thanks
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by darren_a1 View Post
    Mr. F:

    I finally did the math on that

    here is what i get before i multiply with the factor of 0.916076405

    162.37 < mu < 133.03

    after multiplying by 0.916076405 we have

    148.74 < mu < 121.86
    Mr F says: Yes, this is the interval you want.

    Hope some one can help me out with this!

    Thanks

    Darren
    And I hope you see that as n gets larger the FPCF gets smaller. This makes sense since you become more confident in your estimate as n increases.

    When n = N the FPCF = 0 and your confidence interval consists of the single point {\color{blue}\bar{x}}. This makes sense since when n = N you've obviously sampled the entire population and so {\color{blue}\bar{x} = \mu}.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. I need some questions checked please!
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 9th 2009, 04:42 PM
  2. Last dy/dx Question. Just needs checked.
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: March 22nd 2009, 08:21 PM
  3. need my work checked plz :)
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: October 6th 2008, 11:11 PM
  4. I need this answer checked
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: July 27th 2008, 04:01 PM
  5. Need answer checked
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 9th 2008, 07:44 AM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum