Why is P(A,D_j) <= P(A)P(D_j) in the proof ?
peecee.dk | Vis upload Hjælp_til_bevis[1].pdf
Here is the fil with the PDF. Hope someone can help me!
Thank you!
I thought about buying it, but I should have a copy here, jk.
I was surprised that the first thing in google was a paper of mine from 93.
I didn't think anyone read my crap.
I always considered myself the Kilgore Trout of probability.
Sandor Csorgo, passed away two years ago, sadly.
He was so kind, in one paper to referenced nine of my papers.
I was really proud of that.
Talking about charging, lately I've had to pay page proofs.
One colleague was charged over 500 Euro last year for that.
try page 27/129.
peecee.dk | Vis upload SS1.211[1].pdf
... I should have added that it was a piece of crap and one day I may well write a paper explaining why, which of course will never be accepted for publication (particularly by SIAM Review who seem to have a downer on papers critical of stuff they have published, and by implication the very poor job that their peer reviewers and editors can do).
CB
I don't like to download unknown files.
But I finally went ahead and did so.
But I cannot find page 27
I see pages 161-285, I looked at chapter 27, but I couldn't find the inequality.
And even though it's not in English I can understand most of these theorems.
I may just open up Chow-Teicher and figure out what you're asking.