Hi,
In this proof http://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat414/node/118 I don't understand why the VAR(Y|X) (VAR(Y|X=x) is constant and can be moved outside the integral, isn't it being integrated over x?
Thanks!
Printable View
Hi,
In this proof http://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat414/node/118 I don't understand why the VAR(Y|X) (VAR(Y|X=x) is constant and can be moved outside the integral, isn't it being integrated over x?
Thanks!
It is assumed thatis constant, i.e. it does not depend on
. See (3) at the beginning of the notes.
Now, (3) follows immediately ifis bivariate normal i.e. you can prove (3). If, on the other hand, we aren't assuming a bivariate normal, then the proof is fine and (3) is the key assumption that lets you pull it out of the integral.
Thanks, I see (the notation confused me).
How generally would I go about proving (3) knowing it's bivariate normal?
I actually happen to have a proof sitting on my computer already; it derives the conditional distribution of Y|X:
http://i56.tinypic.com/2j0yw0m.jpg
Some explanation may be in order if you haven't seen something like this before. Essentially the idea is to show that the conditional pdf is proportional (for fixed x, letting y vary) to the pdf of something you know. Then, because they both have to integrate to 1, you conclude that they are equal. (3) follows from this becausedoesn't depend on
.
Wow, thanks! I wasn't expecting the whole proof!
Thanks again!