hi

how can i solved this problem ...

by using integrating of area proof

the ratio between Aphelion velocity and Perihelion velocity equal the ratio between both of them radius

if The orbit is an ellipse??? :(

I need your help as soon as you can

Printable View

- May 22nd 2006, 12:24 PMsweetcan any body help me
hi

how can i solved this problem ...

by using integrating of area proof

the ratio between Aphelion velocity and Perihelion velocity equal the ratio between both of them radius

if The orbit is an ellipse??? :(

I need your help as soon as you can - May 22nd 2006, 01:47 PMCaptainBlackQuote:

Originally Posted by**sweet**

Using Kepler's second law - that the area swept out in unit time by a planet

is a constant - then yes.

At Aphelion and Perihelion the velocity of the planet is at right angles to the

vector from the Sun to the Planet, so the area swept out in unit time in

each case is:

and:

at Aphelion and Perihelion respectivly. Kepler's second law tells us these are

equal so:

,

so:

Hence:

RonL - May 22nd 2006, 02:22 PMtopsquarkQuote:

Originally Posted by**sweet**

Unfortunately it isn't true. So I hope I misunderstood your question! :)

This is an interesting problem, since my book does not give a formula for the speed during an orbit.

For starters, I'll assume you are referring to an inverse-square force law (ie. the "Kepler Problem"). Note that it is possible to produce elliptical orbits from other force laws, so this is necessary information.

The position in terms of the eccentricity is:

where a is the semi-major axis where E is the energy of the body in orbit, M is the central mass, and G is the Universal Gravitation constant.

For perihelion we set and for aphelion we set . This gives a ratio of the radii as:

=

Now we need the apsidal speeds. As with all velocities, the direction is tangent to the path traced by the object over time. Hence we are looking for .

We don't know and we aren't going to get it. However, we do know a relation involving both it and the (constant) angular momentum:

where m is the reduced mass of the system, and L is the angular momentum.

So at aphelion .

and at perihelion .

Thus:

= =

which is not the same as the expression we want. It is, however, the reciprocal of the quotient of the radii, so I'm hoping I understood your question incorrectly.

-Dan - May 22nd 2006, 02:43 PMsweet
CaptainBlack

:D thank u soooo much

but what u mean about A_{Ap}

if u have some paper about Kepler's problem and two body problem

plese give it to me i will grateful for u - May 22nd 2006, 02:47 PMsweet
thank u topsquark

u r method very long but i will think about it

:D - May 22nd 2006, 02:55 PMCaptainBlackQuote:

Originally Posted by**sweet**

when the Planet is at Aphelion. Not a strictly correct notation, perhaps would be better.

RonL - May 22nd 2006, 03:17 PMsweet
ok ...but i know

and u writ it in the form

?????? - May 22nd 2006, 03:26 PMCaptainBlackQuote:

Originally Posted by**sweet**

At aphelion:

because the Planet is moving at rightangles to the segment connecting the

Sun to the Planet.

RonL - May 23rd 2006, 01:05 AMsweet
i get it

CaptainBlack u r the best :cool: