Hi
Please, can some one give me lecture and exercises in Arzelą-Ascoli theorem ??
Thanks in advance!!
Miss_Lolitta
Do not click here!!!Originally Posted by miss_lolitta
Why would a miss-"lolitta" be interested in such messy stuff?![]()
Anyway. Here's one: Letbe the set of Hölder continuous functions on
, with exponent
. Define the norm
.
Show that the closed unit ballof
is compact in the space of all continuous functions on
.
(Enjoy.
Taken from Royden's "Real Analysis" )
Really this is messy stuff!!![]()
I wanted lecture in it because I have an assignment how to write a lecture with explaining by examples then represent this lecture in class..
But I have no ideas about this theorem??![]()
and How I perform this a simply.. without complexity??![]()
ThePerfectHacker & Rebesques....
Thanks so much![]()
Well... If you want, you might say something like this. The Bolzano-Weirstrass theorem, sais that a bounded sequence converges. What can we say about a sequence of functions?
A problem is, we need to be precise about the mode of convergence - so consider the best possible, uniform convergence - the one implied by the sup-norm:![]()
So, if we simply have a sequence of functions, and it is bounded (i.e., the sup-norm is finite for all), do we have uniform convergence? That is, is there a function
with
???
No. The domain could be unbounded, and so our functions may not approach a limit function (though they are bounded).
We fix this (and alike problems) by demanding the domain be compact, say the interval![]()
So, are we now to say uniform convergence is guaranteed? No, again. It could happen we only have pointwise convergence alone (not in the sup-norm, but only that for each,
.)
The additional hypothesis to resolve this, is (uniform) equicontinuity; That is, thein the
definition of continuity, holds globally for all
and
.
(Notice that that the Holder continuous functions in the last exercise do not satisfy this uniformly - but a relaxed form of the theorem can be used.)
So, every bounded and (uniformly) equicontinuous sequence of functions defined on, necessarily has a (uniformly) convergent subsequence - this is what the theorem says.
![]()
![]()
Example. Take. This is a bounded and equicontinuous sequence (show!). Note that for every
does not exist (besides trivial cases).
But, by the Ascoli-Arzela theorem, there exists some subsequenceand a function
with
.
Hope that helps.
That's perfect!!
Well done!!![]()
Please,,Can you prove that :
Let K be a compact subset of Rp and let F be a collection of functions which continuous on K and have values in Rq. The following properties are equivalent:
1- The family F is bounded and uniformly equicontinuous on K.
2- Every sequence from F has a subsequence which is uniformly convergent on K.( this is another state for Arzelą-Ascoli theorem )![]()
Thankssoooo00S00oooo
much
no need, love. i am just dead bored at work.Thanks soooo00S00oooo much
Let K be a compact subset of Rp and let F be a collection of functions which continuous on K and have values in Rq. The following properties are equivalent:
1- The family F is bounded and uniformly equicontinuous on K.
2- Every sequence from F has a subsequence which is uniformly convergent on K.( this is another state for Arzelą-Ascoli theorem)
1 implies 2: This is the proof of the Arzela-Ascoli theorem. It is kind of tedious, but at least there's a diagonal argument.
a) Consider all points ofwith rational coefficients. Call this (numerable) set
, and denote its elements by
.
b) Letbe any sequence of elements of
. We show it has a pointwise convergent subsequence on
.
The sequenceis bounded; By the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, it has a convergent subsequence, say
Apply the same argument for
, yielding a convergent subsequence
(note: the sequence
is thus convergent at
and
). Proceed in this fashion, to obtain a subsequence
of the original sequence
. Then, the sequence
converges for all elements of
.
c) We now show thatconverges uniformly on
. That is,
is Cauchy for all
, in the uniform convergence norm.
Let(these will be fixed later) and
. There exists some
with
due to equicontinuity of the functions and the density ofin
. Also, we have
for sufficiently large.
Therefore
by (1) and (2). So
for all sufficiently large; this means the subsequence is uniformly convergent on
.
2 implies 1: Letbe the metric space of continuous functions on
endowed with the uniform convergence norm.
The given condition implies thatis compact in
, so it is bounded and closed in its topology.
We now show it is equicontinuous. Letbelong to
. Then there is a sequence
in
converging uniformly to
.
Let(to be fixed later). Consider
so large that
![]()
and, from the uniform continuity of, there exists
such that
![]()
for. We thus obtain
![]()
![]()
due to (3) and (4). Sois uniformly equicontinuous.
ok
click here if u sure![]()
good luck![]()
oh,you can't be bribed..
but bonus was candy..Do you like this bribe??![]()
Rebesques,,I would like to tell you that presentation I presented it to my professor who will say the result is it good or no on next Monday ,,
but I'm sure it's excellent!!![]()
just because Rebesques helped me without any bribe..
regard..
lolitta