Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Principal component analysis

  1. #1
    Aug 2013
    United kingdom

    Principal component analysis

    I have a large set of of experimental data (26 batches) with multiple variables (43) sampled at certaintime points.
    the data is all centres around cell growth, so it includes the nutrients, product, waste products and cell growth, so it is all highly correlated and dependant.

    i have tested varying one control level and measured the variables as responses. Can I use principal component analysis to examine this data, will it be worth while? I want to see how the control level effects the process and if it changes the correlation of the data.

    would it be best to build a model using the control data (I.e. where the normal process) and then use the batches with the varied paramete as the validation data? Or is there a better method? And is there away to use one or more of the variables as the desired responses (ie product quantity)

    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    MHF Contributor
    Sep 2012

    Re: Principal component analysis

    Hey DanGosling.

    Principal Component Analysis is a technique that takes a set of random variables and de-correlates them. In the process it also sorts out variables by contribution of variation to the data from high contribution to low contribution.

    If you are looking at using regression modelling (i.e. Y = f(X) where Y is the response and X is the predictors which can be a vector) then PCA is useful in some circumstances particularly when you do have high amounts of correlation or linear dependence between different random variables.

    One particular technique that is used is to do a PCA on your vectors and whenever you have random vectors that give little contribution to the variation explained by your data (through the eigen-values obtained in the PCA process which represent this contribution to variation), then you basically throw these vectors out and do a regression using all of the others.

    Intuitively, PCA basically "rotates" the random vectors to make them un-correlated just like you can rotate a bunch of vectors to be aligned with some specified axes or co-ordinate system.

    If you end up using PCA and throwing out the vectors that aren't significant (due to the nature of the correlation), then you just take these vectors and do whatever regression you want.

    If you want to look at correlations between many variables, then one way to do this is to use complex regression models with many interaction terms and using this you test whether the interaction term is 0 for evidence that correlation doesn't exist between the response and the interaction of predictors.

    An example would be Y = B0 + B1*(A*B*C) where you test B1 = 0 against B1 != 0 for an interaction effect of (A,B,C) on Y.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. direction component of vector without case analysis
    Posted in the Trigonometry Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Oct 11th 2012, 05:56 AM
  2. Principal Component Question
    Posted in the Advanced Statistics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Nov 29th 2011, 10:06 AM
  3. Finding Principal Component
    Posted in the Advanced Statistics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Jun 7th 2011, 12:36 AM
  4. A question in principal Component Analysis
    Posted in the Advanced Statistics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Mar 16th 2011, 12:46 AM
  5. Principal component and factor analysis
    Posted in the Advanced Algebra Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Dec 8th 2009, 12:47 PM

Search Tags

/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum