Re: Fermat's last theorem ( My own Evidence 5 lines one a4)

g must be W+

Y= ( g^n - 1 )^1/n *X please back to first line my evidence t= ( g^n - 1 )^1/n t is W+ t*X = N+ ( 1/3 *30 = 10 ) ---- t=1/3 , X=30 Y = 10

to have W+ and solve ( g^n - 1 )^1/n we must use this equation g= ( (p/q)^n +1 )^1/n

after put g= ( (p/q)^n +1 )^1/n to equation ( g^n - 1 )^1/n we have Y= (p/q) * X p/q it is def. W+ , p,q are C+ and q not equal ZERO

g= ( (p/q)^n +1 )^1/n / ^n

we have g^n = (p/g)^n + 1

we can not find g that will be able solve Y= ( g^n - 1 )^1/n *X ====> we can not find g that will solve main equation THE END OF EVIDENCE

************************************************** *********************

ABOUT MAROSZ EVIDENCE BEAL PRIZE CONJECTURE ( new picture green points - thank You again that You help me find mistake )

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZC5OYdhBqy...0/CIMG2363.JPG

and words

Line III we have two functions ( right ) and (left )

We can make two graphs (right ) and (left ) :

**I zero common points** ==> not exist A that can solve A^x +B^x =C^z

success !!! to get Beal Prize

parallel situation (LEFT) =(RIGHT) but exist +1 OR (right ) graph is more wide

1- two the same parallel graph situation (d=e but not equal 1 and t=n and g=n ) graph can not cross

2- (right equation - graph ) is more wide (d>e and t>g>n ) graph can not cross

OR we have two lines situation( d=e=1)

Two lines situation :

1* Fermat's Last Theorem

2* d=e =1 ( we have two lines )

Equation III and point 1* and point 2* : 1+ (t/n)^x = (g/n)^x

line III n^x + t^x =g^x Impossible to solve n,t,q = Natural +

**II only one common point** success !!! to get Beal Prize

we can have situation where exist only one A that can solve equation A^x +B^x =C^z .

Two graphs can cross only in one point please imagine graphs shape if :

e > d and g >n and t < n and g>n

OR one line and one curve situation ( d=1 t=n and e > d and g>n)

**III all points are common** ==> we have theorem that fit to all A ???

We can not have got two ideal the same graphs (left ) curve and ( right ) curve are different

We can't have two ideal the same graph ( left ) line and ( right ) line

THE END OF EVIDENCE

**Author :** **I'm 32 years old Engineer and inventor **

my patents and vision - city can fly !!! > > SIMPLE PATENTS

Re: Fermat's last theorem ( My own Evidence 5 lines one a4)

Tesla2: you have not addressed the issues I raised in my previous post. So I ask you again - **Please label the horizontal axis of your graph.**

And second, please explain what you mean by this:

Quote:

Originally Posted by **tesla2**

II only one common point success !!! to get Beal Prize we can have situation where exist only one A that can solve equation A^x +B^x =C^z .

Beal is not about showing one possible value of A; it's about showing that for A, B and C to be integers A, B and C must all share a common factor.

Also you have another error: the condition d = e leads to the equation , not .

Re: Fermat's last theorem ( My own Evidence 5 lines one a4)

This is more cleare explain Beal's problem

BEAL's Prize they not request thar "z" can not be equal "y" ( please see start condition )

************************below TXT I copied from AMS page *************************

Beal's Conjecture is related. If a, b, c, x, y, and z are all positive integers and x, y, z are greater than two, ( for me y=z can be !!!)

a^x + b^y = c^z

is only possible when a, b and c have a common prime factor.

Read more: Beale Conjecture 1 Million Dollar Prize - Business Insider

*****************************************

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Ncmu1kpFkE...0/CIMG2366.JPG

Re: Fermat's last theorem ( My own Evidence 5 lines one a4)

Tesla. I think ebaines has shown you a great deal of patience and persistence in trying to help you. It is clear to me that your ideas on FLT need a serious upgrade. I am going to ask you (nicely) to take a break and look at your ideas before you come back to this.

-Dan

Re: Fermat's last theorem ( My own Evidence 5 lines one a4)

Please confirm condition before start read my pdf

x, y, z > 2 there is zero words that z=y or x=y ( x,y,z = variables )

where A, B, C, x, y, and z are positive integers with x, y, z > 2,*** then A, B, and C have a common prime factor.

>>> Beal's conjecture - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MAROSZ ( me ) *** - x, y, z > 2 it is very Important sentence ( FALSE !!! )

Pdf version

>>> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0BX...it?usp=sharing

Re: Fermat's last theorem ( My own Evidence 5 lines one a4)

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**ebaines** Tesla2:

1. Regarding your Fermat's Last Theorem page - back in post #8 I asked you to explain what the plot of the lower line is, and you still have not answered that. As I said before, it appears that the upper line is a plot of

versus t, and the lower line is

versus g. Specifically:

**please label the horizontal axis on your graph**.

Attachment 28651
2. Regarding Beal's Conjecture: all you have shown is that under your condition 1 (d=e and g=t=n, so that z=y and A=B=C) there is no solution to A^x +A^y = A^y for positive values of A. This is obvious. Under condition 2 (d>e and t>g>n, hence y>z and B> C >A) you show that if

then there is no solution for the equation

. Again - this is obvious. It does not prove Beal's Conjecture.

Y= (g^n -1)^1/n *x

and

Z= g*x

(g^n -1)^1/n must be W+ and g must exist if not exist You will not solve

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Iokdrpsk70...0/CIMG2360.jpg

Re: Fermat's last theorem ( My own Evidence 5 lines one a4)

Re: Fermat's last theorem ( My own Evidence 5 lines one a4)

One of the lesson to be had from this topic, is that there is a pretty good reason that Wiles' original proof was so long.