Here is the problem I was given I have no clue how to get the answer's given.I have a test in three weeks on the first four chapters and I am lost like a rat in a maze.
Can someone help?
1)Newton's second law states that where is force in newtons, is mass in kilograms and is the acceleration in meters per second squared. In this case the weight of the object is its force due to gravity. In fact, weight is defined as the force of gravity. Since on earth the acceleration is and it mass is then its force is their product thus, just remember that the definition of a newton is . Thus the force is .Originally Posted by jaycas21
2)The ring is a equilibrium. Because it is motionless by being held by the strings. This means that the Vector Sum of the Force Vectors is a Zero Vector. This is a rule for equilibrium. Maybe you remember that you can convert any vector in a linear combination of unit vectors-meaning expressing them in form. Let represent the magnitude of this vector. Then its x-coordinate is is found throught trigonometry. Since the x-coordinate forms a right triangle we have that thus, because we know the cosine of this angle. Thus, the y-coordinate is also found through trigonometry, since it forms a right angle, thus, . Thus, the vector can be expressed as . By similar reasoning and the fact that . We arrived at (because also important that the sign in front of is negative because we are in the 2nd quadrant thus 135 degrees actually and the cosine has a negative sign there unlike the sine which remains positive). Lastly, the thrid vector is the weight of the ring which is because it only goes down.Originally Posted by jaycas21
Now we state that meaning the vector sum. Which in this case is,
Organize them,
Now, this is important that you can only express the zero vector when both the unit vector are equal to zero themselves.
Thus, a system of linear equations
just simplify the second one, to get,
.
From here I think you can handle it, use any method you wish. I would recommend using determinants to solve this system.
In reference to the second problem I am going to slightly correct ThePerfectHacker... Newton's Second Law states that where F and a are vectors. So in problem 2 we have three forces acting on a single point. The first step is to set up a coordinate system; when in doubt choose +x to the right and +y upward, which is what I believe the book did. So now we break each force up into components in the x and y directions and then add them. They failed to specify an acceleration so I'm going to assume it is 0 m/s2. (That fits with the book's solution.) The components of a vector of zero length are zero so we can ignore components of a.Originally Posted by jaycas21
In the x direction:
mg is straight down, so has no x-component.
F1 is acting up and to the right at an angle of 30 degrees, so
F1x=F1*cos(30).
F2 is acting up and to the left, so F2x will be negative:
F2x=-F2*cos(45).
Thus .
In the y direction we have something similar. F1 and F2 are going to have positive y components and mg will be negative. So:
, where mg was given in the first part.
Now we need to solve for F1 and F2. This is a system of 2 equations in 2 unknowns, so we can do it. In Physics the best way to start this is with the substitution method. Solve one of the equations for, say the first equation for F2 in terms of F1 and plug this into the second equation. Then you can solve for F1. etc.
-Dan
What is ?Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker
The gravitational force is , where is the acceleration
due to gravity (it is independent of mass as Galileo tells us). At the earth's
surface , so the gravitational force
(ie the weight) is
RonL
Sorry, ThePerfectHacker, we posted a new reply at more or less the same time and I didn't note that you had made a second reply. My comment was in reference to your first post where you stated that F=ma was Newton's Second Law. I should have included the quote when I made the comment. My apologies for the confusion!Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker
-Dan
Interesting point here, (I believe its also what originally mislead me about ).Originally Posted by topsquark
In Hackers post he is using to represent metres per second, but he has already
introduced as the mass.
Now I believe the convention is the italic letters like represents a variable or parameter,
in which case the units should be non-italic letters like , or in this case we should
write metres per second as or .
RonL