Letbe a bounded open set. Prove the inclusion
for any
.
It's been a while, so this is just to see if I've unpacked the problem correctly.
and
for
, where
is the weak partial derivative in the
coordinate.
Want to show that if for somethat's true for some
(I assume
??), then
.
Since, it follows that
.
It would suffice to prove the inclusion if could show(although that might not be the case - it's just an initial thought as to how to begin.)
Whatexists means is that there are functions
.
Anyway, I just wanted to see if I have the setup correct. I don't know the common techniques for Sobolev spaces, but what I'll be thinking about is: Can showis bounded a.e.? What about showing just
? What if
, since it's "close" to that? What about approximating
by smooth functions? Can show
on compact subsets that expand to
in a controllable way so that that the limit is also finite? Surely
boounded is important - how should that be exploited? I dunno - it's just initial random thoughts.
I'd be interested to see how it's done, since I imagine it's done using common techniques for this topic. If I get anywhere, I'll post it.
-----
One more observation. The condition thatfor
, the Sobolev-ness, is vital, since without it, the claim fails.
Let. Then
, but
.
failed to be in
because
.
In the same vein, supposeis of the form
. Then:
.
Thus. It also implies that
.
Perhaps an the idea for the proof is found by:somehow gets you, using
, that
for some m > n. And then repeat that reasoning with this bigger m, "staircasing" your way up to higher and higher values so that can eventually conclude
?
(If this approach even worked, I wouldn't expectto "staircase" up - it would remain stuck in
- since otherwise the whole of
would staircase up to be a subset of
, unless of course that's actually true, or true for bounded domains (I simply don't know -but I suspect it's not so).)