Results 1 to 11 of 11

- October 19th 2010, 05:14 AM #1

- Joined
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 5

- October 19th 2010, 07:44 AM #2

- Joined
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 769

- October 19th 2010, 07:45 AM #3

- Joined
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 5

- October 19th 2010, 07:48 AM #4

- Joined
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 769

- October 19th 2010, 07:50 AM #5

- Joined
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 5

- October 19th 2010, 08:00 AM #6

- Joined
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 769

- October 19th 2010, 08:04 AM #7
The logarithm of a sum is not something you can simplify. The identity only works the other way.

With this problem, I'd probably go for a numerical solution using Newton-Raphson. Of course, this assumes you know a, b, and c, and that a and b are both positive. Is that the case?

- October 19th 2010, 08:58 AM #8

- Joined
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 5

- October 19th 2010, 09:01 AM #9

- October 19th 2010, 09:08 AM #10

- Joined
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 5

- October 19th 2010, 09:11 AM #11
Right, but you can always convert an equation-solving problem into a root-finding problem by throwing everything on to one side of the equation thus:

Then you use Newton-Raphson on

If you have convergence problems, and your solutions are oscillating wildly, then you probably don't have a solution for that particular combination of a, b, and c. That's a little warning sign you can look for.