# tennis ball example/coefficient of restitution

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 2 First 12
• Jul 20th 2006, 06:34 AM
malaygoel
Quote:

Originally Posted by topsquark
Yes. According to CaptainBlack (and I no longer have any reason to doubt his definiton) the coefficient of restitution is a ratio between the final and initial "vertical" components of the velocity. (Vertical referring to a normal to the surface of impact.)

-Dan

Thanks.
It was never taught in school.

Malay
• Jul 20th 2006, 06:49 AM
CaptainBlack
[]quote=topsquark]
Quote:

Originally Posted by malaygoel
I haven't performed the experiment, but let me know the answer.

Malay

The point is, using my definition, the ball would eventually stop even over a frictionless surface. (e is always less than 1 in reality) If the ball had a horizontal component of velocity Netwon's 1st says it should always be in motion. A contradiction, so my definition can't be correct.

-Dan
[/quote]

It was not just a thought experiment, I did actually go out and perform
it. I have also been contemplating videoing it and analysing the frames of
the video to try measuring the coefficient :cool: .

RonL
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 2 First 12