Quantum 4

**DiscreteW** · March 6th 2008, 01:11 AM

Given that a particle is illustrated by $\psi(x,t) = Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{-iEt}{\bar{h}}},$

1.) Normalize the wave func.

2.) Find $<x>$ and $<\hat{p}>$

3.) Sketch $|\psi(x,t)|^2$ and explain what the plot illustrates.

------------------------

For 1.), we need this condition to be met:

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}|\psi(x,t)|^2 dx = 1$

So we have:

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\psi(x,t)|^2 dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{-iEt}{\bar{h}}}|^2 dx = 1,$

$\displaystyle \implies C^2 \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left( {e^{-1/2\,{x}^{2}}} \right) ^{2} \left( {e^{{\frac {{\it iEt}} {h}}}} \right) ^{-2} dx = 1$

$\displaystyle \implies C^2\left({e^{-2\,{\frac {{\it iEt}}{h}}}}\sqrt {\pi }\right) = 1 \implies C = {\frac {1}{\sqrt {{e^{-2\,{\frac {{\it iEt}}{h}}}}\sqrt {\pi }}}}$

Not sure if I did this correctly. Used Maple to help me through it. I know we have a value for h that I can plug in, but what about the E and t?

For 2.),

$\displaystyle <x> = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\psi(x,t)|^2 x dx \implies \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{-iEt}{\bar{h}}}|^2 x dx$

$\displaystyle \implies C^2\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left( {e^{-1/2\,{x}^{2}}} \right) ^{2} \left( {e^{{\frac {{\it iEt}}{h}}}} \right) ^{-2} x dx = C^2\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \left( {e^{-1/2\,{x}^{2}}} \right) ^{2}x \left( {e^{{\frac {{\it iEt} }{h}}}} \right) ^{-2} dx = 0$

$C = 0$

Again, not sure if this is right. I had difficulty with finding $<\hat{p}>$ .

I know:

$<\hat{p}> = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dp a(p)pa^{*}(p)$

$\psi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi h}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dp a(p)e^{\frac{ipx}{h}}$

$a(p) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi h}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx\psi(x)e^{\frac{-ipx}{h}}$

although what do I use?

Then, for 3.), that is graphing it, can't plot it with so many variables, as

$|\psi(x,t)|^2 = \left( {e^{-1/2\,{x}^{2}}} \right) ^{2} \left( {e^{-{\frac {{\it iEt}}{h}}}} \right) ^{2}$ .

Thanks topsquark (or whoever else knows this stuff).

**sandstorm** · March 6th 2008, 02:52 AM

Hello,

For number 1, when you square a wave function, you don't just multiply it with itself, rather you multiply it by its complex conjugate.

That'll allow you to solve numbers two and three aswell.

**DiscreteW** · March 7th 2008, 03:34 PM

Originally Posted by sandstorm

Hello,

For number 1, when you square a wave function, you don't just multiply it with itself, rather you multiply it by its complex conjugate.

That'll allow you to solve numbers two and three aswell.

Ugh, thanks. I'll correct it.

**DiscreteW** · March 7th 2008, 03:59 PM

Okay, how is this:

We have: $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\psi(x,t)|^2 dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{-iEt}{\bar{h}}}|^2 dx = 1,$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left[Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{-iEt}{\bar{h}}}\right]\left[Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{iEt}{\bar{h}}}\right]\, dx = 1$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} {C}^{2} \left( {e^{-1/2\,{x}^{2}}} \right) ^{2}{e^{-{\frac {{\it iEt}}{h}}}}{e^{{\frac {{\it iEt}}{h}}}}\, dx = 1$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} {C}^{2} \left( {e^{-1/2\,{x}^{2}}} \right) ^{2}\, dx = 1$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} {C}^{2}e^{-x^2} \, dx = 1$

$c^2\sqrt{\pi} = 1$

$\implies c = \pm \frac{1}{\pi^{\frac{1}{4}}}$

Yay? Nay? I was fortunate that the t dropped out, or I wouldn't know how to solve it. I'm going to hope the same happens when I solve for <x> and .

EDIT: Okay, solved for <x>, although not sure if it's right.

$\displaystyle <x> = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\psi(x,t)|^2 x dx \implies \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{-iEt}{\bar{h}}}|^2 x dx$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} {C}^{2}e^{-x^2}x \, dx$

$= 0$

Can anyone confirm if this is right?

I need help with the set-up for please!

Are we meant to use the C I found in the first part for <x> and ? How should I attack the sketching part? I have the problem with there being too many variables.

**topsquark** · March 7th 2008, 06:44 PM

Originally Posted by DiscreteW

Okay, how is this:

We have: $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\psi(x,t)|^2 dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{-iEt}{\bar{h}}}|^2 dx = 1,$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left[Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{-iEt}{\bar{h}}}\right]\left[Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{iEt}{\bar{h}}}\right]\, dx = 1$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} {C}^{2} \left( {e^{-1/2\,{x}^{2}}} \right) ^{2}{e^{-{\frac {{\it iEt}}{h}}}}{e^{{\frac {{\it iEt}}{h}}}}\, dx = 1$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} {C}^{2} \left( {e^{-1/2\,{x}^{2}}} \right) ^{2}\, dx = 1$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} {C}^{2}e^{-x^2} \, dx = 1$

$c^2\sqrt{\pi} = 1$

$\implies c = \pm \frac{1}{\pi^{\frac{1}{4}}}$

Yay? Nay? I was fortunate that the t dropped out, or I wouldn't know how to solve it. I'm going to hope the same happens when I solve for <x> and .

EDIT: Okay, solved for <x>, although not sure if it's right.

$\displaystyle <x> = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\psi(x,t)|^2 x dx \implies \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{-iEt}{\bar{h}}}|^2 x dx$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} {C}^{2}e^{-x^2}x \, dx$

$= 0$

Can anyone confirm if this is right?

I need help with the set-up for please!

Are we meant to use the C I found in the first part for <x> and ? How should I attack the sketching part? I have the problem with there being too many variables.

This is correct.

Recall that the operator p is, in the position representation
$\hat{p} = -i \hbar \frac{d}{dx}$

So
$ = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^* \left ( -i \hbar \frac{d}{dx} \right ) \psi ~dx$
Please note the position of the operator in the expression. Technically you got it wrong in the <x> calculation. However, since the $\hat{x}$ operator is simply "x" there was no problem with the order of the terms. The calculation demonstrates that you do need to be careful of this in general.

For an arbitrary operator $\hat{A}$ ,
$<A> = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^* \hat{A} \psi ~dx$

Also, once you have found a normalization constant you keep it. That is, after all, the meaning of "constant."

-Dan

**DiscreteW** · March 7th 2008, 07:39 PM

Ah, yes! I foolishly forgot that.

I worked out with your help:

$<\hat{p}> = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^*\left ( -i \hbar \frac{d}{dx} \right ) \psi ~dx$

Thus, we have:

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left[Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{iEt}{\bar{h}}}\right]\left [ -i \hbar \frac{d}{dx} \right ] \left[Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{-iEt}{\bar{h}}}\right] dx$

Hence, we have:

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left[Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{iEt}{\bar{h}}}\right]\left [ -i \hbar\right] \left[ -Cx{e^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}}{e^{{\frac {-iEt}{h}}}}\right]~dx$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} C^2\,i\hbar xe^{-x^2}~dx$

$\frac{-1}{2}\,i{C}^{2}h{e^{-{x}^{2}}}$

So for this we don't get a specific value it seems. How does that look?

**topsquark** · March 7th 2008, 07:45 PM

Originally Posted by DiscreteW

Ah, yes! I foolishly forgot that.

I worked out with your help:

$<\hat{p}> = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^*\left ( -i \hbar \frac{d}{dx} \right ) \psi ~dx$

Thus, we have:

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left[Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{iEt}{\bar{h}}}\right]\left [ -i \hbar \frac{d}{dx} \right ] \left[Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{-iEt}{\bar{h}}}\right] dx$

Hence, we have:

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left[Ce^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}e^{\frac{iEt}{\bar{h}}}\right]\left [ -i \hbar\right] \left[ -Cx{e^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}}{e^{{\frac {-iEt}{h}}}}\right]~dx$

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} C^2\,i\hbar xe^{-x^2}~dx$

Note two things:
1) must be a real number. As this integral winds up with a complex coefficient, it had better be 0.

2) The integral you derived contains an odd integrand over even limits. Thus the integral has a value of 0. You didn't evaluate your result over the endpoints.

-Dan

**DiscreteW** · March 7th 2008, 07:50 PM

Originally Posted by topsquark

Note two things:
1) must be a real number. As this integral winds up with a complex coefficient, it had better be 0.

2) The integral you derived contains an odd integrand over even limits. Thus the integral has a value of 0. You didn't evaluate your result over the endpoints.

-Dan

Hah, yup! Duh. I didn't. Sorry for wasting your time! I should have caught that. And yes, it is 0! Thanks again.

**topsquark** · March 7th 2008, 07:58 PM

Originally Posted by DiscreteW

Hah, yup! Duh. I didn't. Sorry for wasting your time! I should have caught that. And yes, it is 0! Thanks again.

You aren't wasting my time. Your questions are similar to what I had to learn at one point. I'm just happy to be able to help.

-Dan

Thread: Quantum 4

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Display

Quantum 4

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

quantum maths help

Quantum Mechanics

Quantum 2

Quantum 1

Quantum 3

Search Tags