I uploaded the questions that I have, thank you in advance.
It is really hard to give you an answer. There two reasons: first it appears from your #2 that you do not even understand how limit superiors are defined; second the notations vary widely from text to text.
That said, let be a sequence then:
I will give some examples. The first two are bounded sequences.
Let then
Let then . This example maybe where the idea of the tail comes from.
Let then
For #1, what do you know about those sequences? Are they bounded?
So, if I understood it correctly, it's the same idea with the partial limits, in other words we have a sequence, and we have the set S, the set of all partial limits of the sequence and the greatest is equal to the limit of supun, and that is actually the same thing with the expression I wrote, right ? For example the third example that you gave has two subsequences , one converges to infinity, and the other to 0, so S={0, infinity} and infinity is superior therefore we say limsup(un)=infinity (I don't know how to write the sign)
For the first question, yes , they are bounded.
If each sequence is bounded, then is bounded and the exists.
Look back at reply #2. Let
Is it clear that the sequence is non-increasing and bounded below by
Also let .
Is it also clear that the sequence is non-increasing and bounded below by
Now let .
You want to prove that .
By contradiction, what happens if