I am trying to prove an idientity I have come accross in a book:
I have managed to prove,
using various facts such as
- and .
But I can't prove the above more difficult identity. Can anyone help me with this?
Thanks for reading.
This is precisely the part I was stuck on, was not sure how to deal with all terms that arise from the 3rd order expansion of the "big" log term on the right. But then I realized the term absorbs most of them.