I am trying to prove an idientity I have come accross in a book:

I have managed to prove,

using various facts such as

- ,
- and .

But I can't prove the above more difficult identity. Can anyone help me with this?

Thanks for reading.

Results 1 to 3 of 3

- November 22nd 2011, 08:52 PM #1

- Joined
- Oct 2009
- From
- London
- Posts
- 42

- November 23rd 2011, 12:10 AM #2

- Joined
- Nov 2005
- From
- someplace
- Posts
- 14,972
- Thanks
- 4

- November 23rd 2011, 01:18 PM #3

- Joined
- Oct 2009
- From
- London
- Posts
- 42

## Re: Big Oh question

This is precisely the part I was stuck on, was not sure how to deal with all terms that arise from the 3rd order expansion of the "big" log term on the right. But then I realized the term absorbs most of them.