Integrals involving complex exponentials
Hello Everyone!
I'm being reluctant when finding integrals involving complex exponentials, of the form:
1. 
2. 
This is because I do not know what to do with infinities multiplied by a complex number, but I know as 
Is there a way to solve this without getting into Fourier transform? I know that generalized functions are involved in those integrals, but can we got an answer without going through that?
Thanks!
Re: Integrals involving complex exponentials
Those integrals do not converge. Period.
Re: Integrals involving complex exponentials
Re: Integrals involving complex exponentials
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rebghb
Okay. So let's put

in place of

, we get

kinda reminds me of something (Happy)
Isn't that the Fourier transform of
 = 1)
?
Whatever some people think that is not how the FT of f(x)=1 is defined (at least without specifying what convergence method you want to use)
CB
Re: Integrals involving complex exponentials
I know this integral, eventually gives
. But that's like giving infity a function in other variable
Re: Integrals involving complex exponentials
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rebghb
I know this integral, eventually gives
)
. But that's like giving infity a function in other variable
Not under a conventional definition of integration. You need to resort to the theory of distributions to get the delta functional.
CB
Re: Integrals involving complex exponentials
Alright, before closing the thread, I would like to say, In a course on basic signal proecssing, they establish the following:
} =\int ^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\delta (t) e^{-i2\pi ft dt} = 1)
Now, by inverse transform, and exchanging variables, we get the that the Fourier transform of f(t)=1 is
. Is this mathematically accepted?
NB The delta here is the Dirac delta
Re: Integrals involving complex exponentials
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rebghb
Alright, before closing the thread, I would like to say, In a course on basic signal proecssing, they establish the following:
Now, by inverse transform, and exchanging variables, we get the that the Fourier transform of f(t)=1 is
)
. Is this mathematically accepted?
NB The delta here is the Dirac delta
Yes, in a slightly hand-waving way, but acceptable in signal processing and physics
CB