Results 1 to 4 of 4

Math Help - IVP using Leibniz formula

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    70

    IVP using Leibniz formula

    How does one formulate this integral equation as an initial value problem?

    u(t)=1 + integral from 0 to t (s ln (s/t) u(s) ds)

    we're supposed to use Leibniz formula but I'm not sure how to apply it. Thanks!
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    A Plied Mathematician
    Joined
    Jun 2010
    From
    CT, USA
    Posts
    6,318
    Thanks
    4
    Awards
    2
    So your integral equation is

    u(t)=1+\int_{0}^{t}s\ln\left(\frac{s}{t}\right)u(s  )\,ds,

    and you need to convert to an IVP using the Leibniz formula, which is, in this case,

    \frac{d}{dt}\int_{a(t)}^{b(t)}f(s,t)\,ds=\frac{db(  t)}{dt}\,f(b(t),t)-\frac{da(t)}{dt}\,f(a(t),t)+\int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\,f(s,t)\,ds.

    So, why not just differentiate the original integral equation with respect to t, and use the Leibniz formula on the integral. What do you get?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    MHF Contributor Drexel28's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    From
    Berkeley, California
    Posts
    4,563
    Thanks
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by Ackbeet View Post
    So your integral equation is

    u(t)=1+\int_{0}^{t}s\ln\left(\frac{s}{t}\right)u(s  )\,ds,

    and you need to convert to an IVP using the Leibniz formula, which is, in this case,

    \frac{d}{dt}\int_{a(t)}^{b(t)}f(s,t)\,ds=\frac{db(  t)}{dt}\,f(b(t),t)-\frac{da(t)}{dt}\,f(a(t),t)+\int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\,f(s,t)\,ds.

    So, why not just differentiate the original integral equation with respect to t, and use the Leibniz formula on the integral. What do you get?
    Why not just note that \displaystyle \int _0^t s\log\left(\frac{s}{t}\right)u(s)\text{ }ds=\int_0^t s\log(s)u(s)\text{ }ds-\log(t)\int_0^t su(s)\text{ }ds from which all you need is the product rule and the FTC?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    A Plied Mathematician
    Joined
    Jun 2010
    From
    CT, USA
    Posts
    6,318
    Thanks
    4
    Awards
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Drexel28 View Post
    Why not just note that \displaystyle \int _0^t s\log\left(\frac{s}{t}\right)u(s)\text{ }ds=\int_0^t s\log(s)u(s)\text{ }ds-\log(t)\int_0^t su(s)\text{ }ds from which all you need is the product rule and the FTC?
    True enough, but if the OP'er must use the Leibniz formula because of class restraints, then we're back to square one.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 15th 2011, 01:30 PM
  2. leibniz notation
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: April 23rd 2011, 07:51 AM
  3. Leibniz formula and chain rule
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 26th 2010, 02:07 PM
  4. Leibniz notation.
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: April 9th 2010, 04:20 AM
  5. Leibniz's formula
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: October 30th 2008, 02:45 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum