I have to calculate Z transform of following equation

where x = sT/2 ( I could not write in latex in direct equation thats why i am showing x)

Kindly show me all steps

Thanks

Printable View

- July 7th 2010, 08:18 AMmoonnightingaleHelp is required for Z transform
I have to calculate Z transform of following equation

where x = sT/2 ( I could not write in latex in direct equation thats why i am showing x)

Kindly show me all steps

Thanks - July 7th 2010, 08:45 AMAckbeet
Just to clarify, you're required to compute the Z transform of the function . Is that correct?

- July 7th 2010, 08:47 AMmoonnightingale
yes absolutely right

kindly show me all steps to solve this problem

Thanks - July 7th 2010, 08:51 AMAckbeet
One more clarification: I'm assuming that is an integer. Correct?

- July 7th 2010, 09:04 AMmoonnightingale
No s is not an integer

s is basically Laplace domain.

Basically this is in continuous time and i have to make it in discrete form for which i have equation

In that equation i have to perform Z transform. of it. then i will move from laplace domain to z domain

Kindly avoid moving from Laplace to time domain and from time domain to z domain

This question is required to be solved directly from Laplace domain to Z domain

Thnnks - July 7th 2010, 09:10 AMmoonnightingale
I am also uploading the solution of instructor but i am unable to understand it

Kindly this to me or if u have got some easy solution that will be more convenient for me - July 7th 2010, 11:03 AMAckbeet
I feel like I'm missing something here. Could you please state the original problem, word-for-word? Thanks!

- July 8th 2010, 04:11 AMmoonnightingale
Nothing is missing

I just have to find Z transform of this

where x = sT/2 ( I could not write in latex in direct equation thats why i am showing x) - July 8th 2010, 05:17 AMCaptainBlack
- July 8th 2010, 05:58 AMAckbeet
Many thanks to CB for that illuminating post.

There is an error in your tutor's calculations. Everything is correct up until the last line, which should be the following:

- July 8th 2010, 08:02 AMmoonnightingale
I am unable to understand. Can anybody explain this to me with other simple method

Thanks - July 8th 2010, 08:16 AMAckbeet
Well, your tutor's method of solution is precisely what CB said it was. That is evidently the method of solution desired. I'm not sure there is a simpler method. The substitution does not appear to coincide with your tutor's method. I'm not sure I understand why. Does CB have any ideas?

- July 8th 2010, 09:02 PMCaptainBlack
This cannot work for an arbitrary signal as it would imply the equality of a sum dependent on the signal values at the sample points and an integral dependent on the signal at all (positive) times. That these cannot be equal is clear as the value of the integral can be altered by altering the signal between sample points leaving the sum unchanged.

It does map the LT of the signal multiplied by a comb of deltas (iirc) to the ZT of the sampled signal.

CB