hi all

plz take alook to this pdf(attachment)...

section 4.3.1(axisymmetric jet)

i am lookng for the full derivation(with all details) of equation 4.3.16b

anybody can help me or give me a hint...

it is an emergency....

thanks

Printable View

- June 2nd 2010, 05:33 AMmorteza08axisymmetric jet formula derivation
hi all

plz take alook to this pdf(attachment)...

section 4.3.1(axisymmetric jet)

i am lookng for the full derivation(with all details) of equation 4.3.16b

anybody can help me or give me a hint...

it is an emergency....

thanks - June 5th 2010, 03:16 AMAckbeetGetting 4.3.16b from 4.3.16a
I'm not sure how far back you need to go. However, if you look at 4.3.16a and go from there, the authors claim that

This is most definitely true if it is known that is bounded. is called the stream function. If it represents a physical parameter, then most likely you can assume is bounded on physical grounds. The same goes for itself. But now, if and are both bounded, then it is the case that .

The authors also claim that goes to as goes to infinity. If that is the case, then if you take limits in the entire Equation 4.3.16a, you will get on the LHS, which implies you must get on the RHS. Hence, . Multiplying through by gives you Equation 4.3.16b.

So, in getting 4.3.16b from 4.3.16a, the problem reduces down to knowing that and are both bounded, and that .

With regard to the second derivative, you might be able to get that from the "note" in-between Equations 4.3.10 and 4.3.11: "... noting that ..." This tells you that , and hence . Is it the case that ?

These are just the beginnings of some ideas. - June 5th 2010, 08:32 AMmorteza08
thanks dear dr. ackbeet

i try solving the problem , in the case of any problem i'll leave another message here...

good luck - June 9th 2010, 10:58 PMmorteza08

hello

according to your reply to the thread :

http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-he...erivation.html

I want to ask you to write the full derivation for obtaining eq. 4.3.16b from the first with all details...

i have not enough time to spend on it..

i am ready to pay you for solving this problem...

i just want you to solve

morteza08@gmail.com - June 10th 2010, 02:24 AMAckbeet
I'm sorry, Morteza, but that's not the way we operate in this forum. We don't just solve your problems for you. You have to do the main work; we'll help you get unstuck if you need a little push here or there. Otherwise, you see, you won't own the answer for yourself. So ask away on specific questions all you like, where you've shown you've done some work, and we'll help you out.

- June 10th 2010, 09:10 AMmorteza08thanks
dera dr.

I know this is not the rule here to solve a peoblem , that's why i did not ask you to solve the prblem at my first thread,,, but please make me hopeful, could you please help me if i send you my work and giv me hints if i need,,,,

thanks...it is a vital project and you are the only dear person that helped me to start solving the problem, i want to be quarranteed in the rest of the work.. - June 10th 2010, 09:22 AMAckbeet
I will gladly help you, if you take the initiative. Do the following for me, please:

1. Tell me exactly which equation you want to start from (along with any other assumptions, conditions, etc., that go along with that equation). You've already said you want to derive Equation 4.3.16b. So, together, the starting point and ending point give us a trajectory of thought and define the problem.

2. Show me the first place in the logical train of thought, from the starting equation(s) that you determined in Step 1 to Equation 4.3.16b, where you are stuck. - June 10th 2010, 09:26 AMmorteza08
- June 16th 2010, 10:57 AMAckbeet
Have you made any progress while the site was down?

- June 17th 2010, 11:06 PMmorteza08
Hi Dr. Keister

Yes I wrote down the derivation process and i circled where i have problem with. that is not with me right now, i will show you it as soon as i go home..

thx for your compassion and follow-up - June 18th 2010, 07:01 PMAckbeet
Have you got any updates?

- June 19th 2010, 10:53 AMmorteza08