Here's a little troublesome inequality: Prove that

I would appreciate a shorter solution, but with less theory involved... Asking 2 much? :(

Printable View

- Jul 25th 2005, 07:21 AMRebesquesan inequality
Here's a little troublesome inequality: Prove that

I would appreciate a shorter solution, but with less theory involved... Asking 2 much? :( - Jul 25th 2005, 08:40 AMRebesques:(
Just noticed, this is the wrong place for the topic to be... Could one of the administrators please move this thread to the "inequalities" section? :(

- Jul 25th 2005, 09:23 AMMathGuru
The inequalities forum is for elementary school math (for younger students). If you don't want it in the university level algebra forum, let me know which section suits it the best.

- Jul 30th 2005, 06:34 PMhpeQuote:

Originally Posted by**Rebesques**

Then f(0) = 1, , and both g(x) and h(x) are log-concave (that is, their logarithms are concave down). It is known that the sum of log-concave functions is also log-concave, so f is log-concave. As a consequence,

- Jul 30th 2005, 11:57 PMRebesques?
Ellegant, short, not heavily theoretic; Excellent :)

Thanks!