Hello,
I don't seem to see the problem. There is only the claim of inequality, not strict inequality? For example, in one can see that is of minimal degree, but so is , but that they are coprime.
Best,
Alex
I am reading the Proof of Hilbert's Basis Theorem in Rotman's Advanced Modern Algebra ( See attachment for details of the proof in Rotman).
Hilbert's Basis Theorem is stated as follows: (see attachment)
Theorem 6.42 (Hilbert's Basis Theorem) If R is a commutative noetherian ring, the R[x] is also noetherian.
The proof begins as follows: (see attachment)
Proof: Assume that I is an ideal in R[x] that is not finitely generated; of course .
Define to be a polynomial in I of minimal degree, and define, inductively to be a polynomial of minimal degree in .
It is clear that ... ... ... (1)
Question: Is polynomial of minimal degree simply any polynomial of least or smallest degree in I. If so how can we be sure (1) holds.
If for the stage of choosing , for example the minimum degree is 3 and there are a number (possibly infinite) of such polynomials in I, how can we be sure that includes all of these, so that contains no polynomials of degree 3 and so the degree of will be larger and so 1 holds.
To try to answer my own question ... ... I am assuming that the ideal includes all the polynomials of the same degree as . Is that correct?
Can someone clarify the above.
Peter
Hello,
I don't seem to see the problem. There is only the claim of inequality, not strict inequality? For example, in one can see that is of minimal degree, but so is , but that they are coprime.
Best,
Alex