The set of all permutations of a A with composition operation is a group:How to show?
Let
be the subset of
consisting of the permutations:




Now show that
is a group of permutations.
Now the problem is how do I prove this? Because I know that in order to be a group of permutations I've to show the following
properties:
a) The operation
of composition of functions qualifies as an operation on the set of all the permutations of 
b) This operation is associative.
c) There is a permutation
such that
and
for any permutation
of
.
d) Finally for every permutation
of
there is another permutation
of
such that 
and 
Do I exhaust all the possible values and show that the above four properties hold true for all combinations?
Is there any easy way to prove that the set of all the above permutations is a group?
Re: The set of all permutations of a A with composition operation is a group:How to s
Quote:
Originally Posted by
x3bnm
Let

be the subset of

consisting of the permutations:

Now show that

is a group of permutations.
Is there any easy way to prove that the set of all the above permutations is a group?
Well it is it is easy to see that each of those is its own inverse.
Moreover, the set is closed under the operation.
Re: The set of all permutations of a A with composition operation is a group:How to s
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Plato
Well it is it is easy to see that each of those is its own inverse.
Moreover, the set is closed under the operation.
Thanks Plato for help.
Re: The set of all permutations of a A with composition operation is a group:How to s
b) is obvious: composition of functions is associative:
if h(x) = y, and g(y) = z and f(z) = w, then:
(fo(goh))(x) = f((goh)(x)) = f(g(h(x))) = f(g(y)) = f(z) = w
((fog)oh)(x) = (fog)(h(x)) = (fog)(y) = f(g(y)) = f(z) = w.
as Plato pointed out, every element (function) is its own inverse, so we have (d).
(c) is redundant: closure (a) & inverses (d) together imply (c). you can safely avoid proving this (it will be true: if a*b is in S whenever a,b are, and a-1 is in S when a is, then if a is in S, then so is a-1, so taking b = a-1, we have:
a*b = a*a-1 = e is in S).
there is a trick you can use to show closure:
let a = (1 2)(3 4) (this is f in your original post...by (1 2)(3 4) i mean f(1) = 2, f(2) = 1, f(3) = 4, and f(4) = 3).
let b = (1 3)(2 4) (this is g in your original post).
show your last element is a*b.
this means that G = {e,a,b,a*b}
show that a*b = b*a. this implies that G is abelian (why? hint: a and b are generators...why?). this cuts down the number of products you have to verify closure for down from 16 to 10. 4 of those you will already have verified by proving you have inverses (the ones of the form g*g). that leaves just 6 to check. if you happen to notice that ε is the identity function on {1,2,3,4}, this makes 3 of the remaining products to check for closure trivial. that leaves just three products you have to work for:
a*b <---but you'll already have calculated this verifying a*b = b*a
a*(a*b) <---asociativity and inverses make this trivial
b*(a*b) <---use associativity and the fact that b*a = a*b, and what you learned about inverses.
extra credit: show that G is isomorphic to the klein 4-group V (for vierergruppe, german for "four-group"), and also to the direct product: (Z2xZ2,+) (where + means addition mod 2, the elements are:
{(0,0),(1,0),(0,1),(1,1)} you can think of this as "a pair of unlinked switches").
Re: The set of all permutations of a A with composition operation is a group:How to s
Re: The set of all permutations of a A with composition operation is a group:How to s
but...but...the "two-step" makes a much nicer dance....
Re: The set of all permutations of a A with composition operation is a group:How to s
Plato thanks a lot for the neat theory of yours. It's heck of a lot of time saver.
Deveno, thanks for the explanation. Very interesting reading and pretty smart notation you showed there for closure. It's very concise. Your explanation makes me want to ask for more of Abstract Algebra.