Re: Complement of a subgroup
Quote:
Originally Posted by
moont14263
to me, reading this, this is NOT so clear. how do we KNOW x is not in K?
of course, if it is, then x2 is in K as well (by closure, since x*x must lie in K), contradicting <x2>∩K = {1}.
rather than argue that G = <x>K (which still requires further proof), i would use the fact that x is in G, and G = <x^2>K, to assert that x = x2k, for some k in K (we ruled out x = k above).
thus x-1 = x3 = (x2)x = (x2)(x2k) = k, so x = k-1 which is in K, contradiction.
Re: Complement of a subgroup
Your proof is clearer, thank you very much.