1 Attachment(s)
Reflections - Kane's Book
I am reading Kane - Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory and need help with property A-4 of the properties of reflections stated on page 7
(see attachment - Kane _ Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory - pages 6-7)
On page 6 Kane mentions he is working in http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex? \ell dimensional Euclidean space ie http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex? E = R^{\ell} where http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex? R^{\ell} has the usual inner product (x,y).
In defining reflections with respect to vectors Kane writes:
" Given http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex? 0 \ne \alpha \in E let http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?...lpha}\subset E be the hyperplane
http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?...alpha ) = 0 \}
We then define the reflection http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?...ngrightarrow E by the rules
http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?...a} \cdot x = x if http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex? x \in H_{\alpha}
http://latex.codecogs.com/png.latex?...pha = - \alpha "
Then Kane states that the following property follows:
(A-4) If
is an orthogonal automorphism of E then
Can someone explicitly and formally demonstrate A-4?
I am not really sure of the meaning of
but I assume
And I assume that

Can anyone help me formulate an explicit and detailed proof of A-4
Peter
Peter
Re: Reflections - Kane's Book
first of all, realize that
is an equality of two sets.
so suppose
. then
for some
.
so
and because
is orthogonal,
, that is ) = 0)
so
, so
.
now suppose we have
, so that
.
since
is an orthogonal automorphism, it is bijective, and its inverse
is also orthogonal.
so
. but
.
this means that
so
,
which shows that
, thus the two sets are equal.
the second equality, is an equality of functions, so we must show that the two functions have the same value at every point of
.
so let
. since
is surjective, we can write
for some
,
where
. so then we have:
 = \phi s_\alpha \phi^{-1}(\phi(w)) = \phi s_\alpha(w) = \phi s_\alpha(x + k\alpha) = \phi(s_\alpha(x) + ks_\alpha(\alpha)))
 = \phi(x) - k\phi(\alpha) = s_{\phi(\alpha)}(\phi(x) + k\phi(\alpha)) = s_{\phi(\alpha)}(\phi(x+k\alpha)))
for all
.
this shows the two functions are indeed equal on all of
.