Hi:
In a certain book the following definition is given: Let G be a group. A normal subgroup N1 of G is a minimal normal subgroup of G if 1 and N are the only normal subgroups of G that are contained in N.
Then the following proposition is stated: Letbe a minimal normal subgroup of
. If
is an epimorphism from
to a group
, then
or
is a minimal normal subgroup of
.
The author gives this proof: Letbe a normal subgroup of
that is contained in
. Then
is a normal subgroup of
, and
since
. Hence
and
.
OK. But why? Since
is homomorphism and
normal in
,
is normal in
. And the intersection of two normal subgroups is a normal subgroup, that is
is normal in
. But
and N is minimal normal in
. Hence either
or
. Hence, if it were true that
, we would have
. Assuming the latter is true, we have the following:
,
. But since
is onto,
. Hence
. But
by assumption. Hence
.
As you see, I can follow the steps in the proof, except for the inference "". Any suggestion?
The book is The Theory of Finite Groups, An Introduction, by Kurzweil and Stellmacher, and the proposition is proposition 1.7.1, p. 36.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks