prove that |HK| = |H||K| / |H ∩ K| (using group actions)

I want to prove that |HK| = |H||K| / |H ∩ K| using group actions. First, I let H and K be subgroups of G and the set S be defined as the set of left cosets of K in G. I define a group action by a * (xK) = axK where and .

by considering the orbit of the element K in S, i have that the orbit of K is the set of all s = a*K = aK, such that . but this is just the set theoretic product HK, so the orbit of K is equal to HK. From the orbit stabilizer theorem, the number of elements in the orbit of K is equal to the number of left cosets of the stabilizer of K. The stabilizer of K is the set of all a such that a*K = aK = K and . but this implies that and so . so the stabilizer of K is the set .

now the number of left cosets of the stabilizer of K is |H|/|H ∩ K|. therefore the orbit stabilizer theorem says that |HK| = |H|/|H ∩ K|, but i seem to be missing a factor of |K| somewhere and going through the problem I can't seem to find where it must come from. Can someone help show me what went wrong? thanks.

Re: prove that |HK| = |H||K| / |H ∩ K| (using group actions)

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**oblixps** I want to prove that |HK| = |H||K| / |H ∩ K| using group actions. First, I let H and K be subgroups of G and the set S be defined as the set of left cosets of K in G. I define a group action by a * (xK) = axK where

and

.

by considering the orbit of the element K in S, i have that the orbit of K is the set of all s = a*K = aK, such that

. but this is just the set theoretic product HK, so the orbit of K is equal to HK. From the orbit stabilizer theorem, the number of elements in the orbit of K is equal to the number of left cosets of the stabilizer of K. The stabilizer of K is the set of all a such that a*K = aK = K and

. but this implies that

and

so

. so the stabilizer of K is the set

.

now the number of left cosets of the stabilizer of K is |H|/|H ∩ K|. therefore the orbit stabilizer theorem says that |HK| = |H|/|H ∩ K|, but i seem to be missing a factor of |K| somewhere and going through the problem I can't seem to find where it must come from. Can someone help show me what went wrong? thanks.

The problem is that your orbit is not . The elements of your orbit are which is not equal to .One's a set of cosets one is a set of group elements(don't worry, I had to stare at it for five minutes too. I was like "this guy just disproved math". haha, we all do stupid things, no worries).

I would suggest letting act on by . Then, and . Clearly then by the orbit stabilizer theorem .

This generalizes to the notion of double cosets if you're interested.

Re: prove that |HK| = |H||K| / |H ∩ K| (using group actions)

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**oblixps** I want to prove that |HK| = |H||K| / |H ∩ K| using group actions. First, I let H and K be subgroups of G and the set S be defined as the set of left cosets of K in G. I define a group action by a * (xK) = axK where

and

.

by considering the orbit of the element K in S, i have that the orbit of K is the set of all s = a*K = aK, such that

. but this is just the set theoretic product HK, so the orbit of K is equal to HK. From the orbit stabilizer theorem, the number of elements in the orbit of K is equal to the number of left cosets of the stabilizer of K. The stabilizer of K is the set of all a such that a*K = aK = K and

. but this implies that

and

so

. so the stabilizer of K is the set

.

now the number of left cosets of the stabilizer of K is |H|/|H ∩ K|. therefore the orbit stabilizer theorem says that |HK| = |H|/|H ∩ K|, but i seem to be missing a factor of |K| somewhere and going through the problem I can't seem to find where it must come from. Can someone help show me what went wrong? thanks.

K is not an a single element it is a set which has l K l elements

you can check this thread look into post #2

Re: prove that |HK| = |H||K| / |H ∩ K| (using group actions)

I want to ask do HK is a subgroup of G ??

If yes, DO we need to assume one of the H, K is normal subgroup of G to ensure HK is normal in G ??

If HK is not a subgroup of G, will the equality become Inequality??

Re: prove that |HK| = |H||K| / |H ∩ K| (using group actions)

HK is usually NOT a subgroup of G. if one of H,K is normal in G, then HK will be a subgroup:

let's say K is normal:

then (hk)(h'k') = h(kh')k', and since K is normal, Kh' = h'K, so kh' = k"h', for some k" in K, so

h(kh')k' = h(h'k")k' = (hh')(k"k'), which is in HK, so HK is closed under multiplication.

note that (hk)^{-1} = k^{-1}h^{-1}.

since Kh^{-1} = h^{-1}K, k^{-1}h^{-1} = h^{-1}k', for some k' in K, so:

(hk)^{-1} = h^{-1}k', which is in HK (since h^{-1} is in H, because H is a subgroup).

thus HK contains all inverses of elements hk in HK, and is thus a subgroup of G.

IF HK is a subgroup, there is still no guarantee that HK will be a NORMAL subgroup.

for example H = {e, (1 2)(3 4)} and K = {e, (1 3)(2 4)} are both subgroups of A_{5}, and HK = {e, (1 2)(3 4), (1 3)(2 4), (1 4)(2 3)}

is indeed a subgroup of A_{5}, but A_{5} is simple as has no normal subgroups.

indeed, even the normality of H (or K) does not guarantee the normality of HK,

in D_{6}, the dihedral group of order 12, we have that <r^{3}> is normal in D_{6},

so if we take H = <r^{3}> = {1, r^{3}} and K = {1,s}, w have that HK = {1, r^{3}, s, r^{3}s} is a subgroup of D_{6}.

however, this subgroup is not normal, consider the left coset r(HK) =

{r,r^{4}, rs, r^{4s}}, while the right coset (HK)r =

{r, r^{4}, r^{5}s, r^{2}s}, so r(HK) and (HK)r are different, thus HK is not normal.

i'm not sure what you mean about "equality", as in the equation:

|HK| = |H||K|/|H∩K|, there is no "inequality". and the normality of H and K has nothing to do with the size of H∩K:

let G = Z_{12}, the group of integers mod 12. this group is abelian, so EVERY subgroup is normal.

let H = <2> = {0,2,4,6,8,10}, and let K = <3> = {0,3,6,9}.

even though both groups are normal, we have a non-trivial intersection: H∩K = {0,6}.